Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Combined expectancy effects: an accumulator model.

Uwe Mattler1

  • 1Department of Neurology II, Center for Advanced Imaging, Otto-von-Guericke University, Leipziger Strasse 44 (Haus 1), D-39120 Magdeburg, Germany. uwe.mattler@medizin.uni-magdeburg.de

Cognitive Psychology
|September 13, 2005
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Spatial alignment and the motion bridging effect: Reversals in the direction of an illusory rotation.

i-Perception·2025
Same author

Metacontrast masking does not change with different display technologies: A comparison of CRT and LCD monitors.

Behavior research methods·2024
Same author

The Ring Rotation Illusion: Properties and Links of a Novel Illusion of Motion.

i-Perception·2021
Same author

No effect of very brief exposure to masked food pictures on fear of food in anorexia nervosa.

European eating disorders review : the journal of the Eating Disorders Association·2021
Same author

Encoding Information From Rotations Too Rapid To Be Consciously Perceived as Rotating: A Replication of the Motion Bridging Effect on a Liquid Crystal Display.

i-Perception·2020
Same author

Visual experience forms a multidimensional pattern that is not reducible to a single measure: Evidence from metacontrast masking.

Journal of vision·2020
Same journal

Sublexical semantic decoding during incidental novel word learning in natural Chinese reading.

Cognitive psychology·2026
Same journal

Seeing, hearing, and feeling causation.

Cognitive psychology·2026
Same journal

Separating decision and motor contributions to behavioral biases induced by manipulating stimulus probability.

Cognitive psychology·2026
Same journal

Congruency drives "conflict adaptation" independent of conflict: Converging evidence from behavior and computational modeling.

Cognitive psychology·2026
Same journal

Corrigendum to "Network analyses identify critical factors for facilitating future-oriented decision-making" [Cogn. Psychol. 165 (2026) 101815].

Cognitive psychology·2026
Same journal

The time course of local coherence effects in German: Evidence from self-paced reading times and event-related potentials.

Cognitive psychology·2026
See all related articles

Valid cues speed up reaction times, while invalid cues slow them down. Integrated cues interact, unlike separable cues, influencing cognitive processing stages differently.

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Neuroscience
  • Computational Modeling

Background:

  • Cueing paradigms investigate how advance information (cues) affects performance.
  • Expectancy effects demonstrate how anticipated stimuli or responses influence reaction times.
  • Combined expectancy effects explore how multiple cues interact to shape cognitive preparation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To model the interaction of cueing effects when cues are presented as integrated stimuli.
  • To explain how integrated cues lead to interactive effects, unlike separable cues.
  • To propose a neurophysiologically plausible model for combined expectancy effects.

Main Methods:

  • Development of a computational model simulating cueing effects.
  • Mathematical formulation of the model based on processing stages.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Testing the model against empirical data from combined expectancy studies.

    • Main Results:

    • Separable cues result in additive effects, indicating independent processing.
    • Integrated cues lead to interactive effects due to a feedback mechanism.
    • The model successfully simulates observed cueing effects across different cue integration conditions.

    Conclusions:

    • Cue integration influences the interaction between processing stages.
    • A feedback mechanism adjusts later processing based on early cue validity for integrated stimuli.
    • The proposed model provides a robust explanation for combined expectancy effects in cognitive tasks.