Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Stimulus competition by inhibitory interference.

Paul H E Tiesinga1

  • 1Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA. tiesinga@physics.unc.edu

Neural Computation
|September 15, 2005
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Functional effect predictions for ion channel missense variants using a protein language model.

Journal of human genetics·2026
Same author

Translating single-neuron axonal reconstructions into meso-scale connectivity statistics in the mouse somatosensory thalamus.

Frontiers in neuroinformatics·2023
Same author

Comprehensive characterization of oscillatory signatures in a model circuit with PV- and SOM-expressing interneurons.

Biological cybernetics·2021
Same author

Progress towards a cellularly resolved mouse mesoconnectome is empowered by data fusion and new neuroanatomy techniques.

Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews·2021
Same author

Uncovering Statistical Links Between Gene Expression and Structural Connectivity Patterns in the Mouse Brain.

Neuroinformatics·2021
Same author

Flexible Frequency Switching in Adult Mouse Visual Cortex Is Mediated by Competition Between Parvalbumin and Somatostatin Expressing Interneurons.

Neural computation·2021
Same journal

A Model-Free Reinforcement Learning Implementation of Decision Making Under Uncertainty by Sequential Sampling.

Neural computation·2026
Same journal

DROP: Distributional and Regular Optimism and Pessimism for Reinforcement Learning.

Neural computation·2026
Same journal

Hierarchical Active Inference Using Successor Representations.

Neural computation·2026
Same journal

W-Kernel and Its Principal Space for Frequentist Evaluation of Bayesian Estimators.

Neural computation·2026
Same journal

A Hidden Markov Model-Inspired Sequence Classification Method for Hyperdimensional Computing.

Neural computation·2026
Same journal

Sparse Graphical Modeling for Electrophysiological Phase-Based Connectivity Using Circular Statistics.

Neural computation·2026
See all related articles

Attention directs V4 neuron responses by altering inhibitory timing, not just synchrony. This model explains how top-down attention influences neural processing and stimulus competition in the brain.

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Computational Neuroscience
  • Visual Cortex Research

Background:

  • V4 neuron responses to multiple stimuli are modulated by attention.
  • Attention can enhance responses to preferred stimuli and suppress responses to non-preferred stimuli.
  • Existing models suggest attention alters firing rates but mechanisms remain debated.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To model V4 neuron responses to competing stimuli under attentional modulation.
  • To investigate the role of local interneuron networks and inhibitory timing in attention.
  • To propose a novel mechanism for attentional gain modulation in the cortex.

Main Methods:

  • Developed a computational model of a V4 neuron receiving inputs from V2 and local interneurons.
  • Incorporated stimulus-specific excitation and synchronous inhibitory inputs modulated by frontal eye fields.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Simulated stimulus competition using delayed inhibitory inputs and varied interneuron synchrony.

    • Main Results:

    • The model reproduced experimental findings on V4 neuron responses to paired stimuli with attention.
    • Stimulus competition was influenced by the arrival time of inhibitory inputs.
    • Response to single stimuli was modulated by the synchrony of interneuron networks.

    Conclusions:

    • Top-down attention biases V2-V4 competition by altering inhibitory timing.
    • Changes in interneuron synchrony modulate responses to single stimuli.
    • Gain modulation via inhibitory interference offers a general mechanism for cortical attention.