Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 16, 2026

Fully Endoscopic Mitral Valve Repair with Percutaneous Cannulation of Groin Vessels
Published on: May 26, 2023
[Percutaneous coronary intervention without on-site cardiac surgery: the first one thousand patients]
László Voith1, Tibor Vecsey, László Major
1Fovárosi Bajcsy-Zsilinszky Kórház, Kardiovaszkuláris Katéteres Laboratórium, Budapest.
Insights
Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) shows high success rates for stable and unstable angina, and myocardial infarction. Moderate-risk PCI can be safely performed without on-site cardiac surgery, but high-risk cases require specialized centers.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Interventional Cardiology
- Vascular Medicine
Context:
- Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is a common procedure for treating coronary artery disease.
- Assessing the safety and efficacy of PCI, particularly in centers without on-site cardiac surgery, is crucial for patient outcomes.
- Understanding the indications, success rates, and complication profiles of PCI is essential for clinical decision-making.
Purpose:
- To evaluate the outcomes of first percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) performed at two hospitals.
- To determine the success rates and complication profiles of PCI across different patient groups and indications.
- To assess the feasibility and safety of performing PCI without immediate access to in-hospital cardiac surgery.
Summary:
- A study of 1031 patients undergoing first PCI revealed a 92.1% clinical success rate.
- Major adverse cardiac events occurred in 3.4% of patients, with acute myocardial infarction being the most common (3.3%).
- Within one year, 22.1% of patients required repeat dilatations due to chronic restenosis.
Impact:
- The findings suggest that moderate-risk PCI can be performed effectively and safely without on-site cardiac surgery.
- High-risk PCI procedures should still be conducted in institutions with on-site surgical support.
- This study contributes to the understanding of PCI outcomes and resource allocation in cardiovascular care.
Abstract:
At the two hospitals, first percutaneous coronary intervention was performed on 1031 patients (700 male and 331 female, average age 59.8 +/- 15.1 years) between July 2000 and June 2002. The indications were: stable effort angina 679 (65.8%), unstable angina and non-ST elevation myocardial infarction 267 (26.0%), ST elevation myocardial infarction 85 (8.2%). Single vessel dilatation was performed on 906 (87.9%), double and triple vessel on 125 (12.1%) pts in 1170 vessels (1145 native, 24 saphenous vein and 1 mammary artery graft) and in 1372 stenoses. During the interventions, 1043 stents were implanted in 797 pts, average 1.3/pt. The intervention was clinically successful in 950 (92.1%) and unsuccessful in 81 (7.9%) pts. In most of cases, the lack of success was a result of ineffective recanalisation. 65 major adverse cardiac events occurred in 35 (3.4%) pts (acute redilatation 20 (1.9%), acute surgery 4 (0.4%), acute myocardial infarction 34 (3.3%) and fatal outcome 7 (0.7%). Fatal outcome occurred in the group of stable angina 1 (0.1%), in the group of unstable angina and non-ST elevation myocardial infarction 4 (1.5%), in the group of ST elevation myocardial infarction 2 (2.4%). Within one year, 228 (22.1%) repeated dilatations were performed because of chronic restenosis. The results suggest that the moderate risk interventions can be performed with satisfactory result and average risk even without in-hospital cardiac surgery. High-risk interventions are still to be performed in institutes without on-site surgery.
Related Concept Videos
Cardiac Catheterization I: Pre-Procedure Overview
Acute Coronary Syndrome I: Introduction
Peripheral Artery Disease III: Interprofessional Care
