Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Carotid stenting.

J M Hendriks1, M R H M van Sambeek

  • 1Department of Vascular Surgery, Erasmus University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands. j.m.hendriks@erasmusmc.nl

The Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery
|September 15, 2005
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Editor's Choice - Nationwide Analysis of Patients Undergoing Iliac Artery Aneurysm Repair in the Netherlands.

European journal of vascular and endovascular surgery : the official journal of the European Society for Vascular Surgery·2020
Same author

Unmixing multi-spectral photoacoustic sources in human carotid plaques using non-negative independent component analysis.

Photoacoustics·2019
Same author

[Neurogenic thoracic outlet syndrome].

Nederlands tijdschrift voor geneeskunde·2017
Same author

Visceral aneurysms: Old paradigms, new insights?

Best practice & research. Clinical gastroenterology·2017
Same author

Patient Specific Wall Stress Analysis and Mechanical Characterization of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms Using 4D Ultrasound.

European journal of vascular and endovascular surgery : the official journal of the European Society for Vascular Surgery·2016
Same author

TNM-Classification for Lung Cancer: From the 7(th) to the 8(th) Edition.

Acta chirurgica Belgica·2016
Same journal

Pelvic venous disease and lymphatic dysfunction: evaluating the evidence for a proposed continuum.

The Journal of cardiovascular surgery·2026
Same journal

Incidence of post-dissection aneurysmal formation and need for secondary intervention after surgery for acute type A aortic dissections: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies.

The Journal of cardiovascular surgery·2026
Same journal

The expertise effect: how advancing skills in frozen elephant trunk have broadened surgical indication for acute dissection.

The Journal of cardiovascular surgery·2026
Same journal

Outcomes of pulmonary embolism response teams: a systematic review.

The Journal of cardiovascular surgery·2026
Same journal

Use of large bore devices in the treatment of pulmonary embolism.

The Journal of cardiovascular surgery·2026
Same journal

Contemporary role of systemic thrombolysis in the management of acute pulmonary embolism.

The Journal of cardiovascular surgery·2026
See all related articles

Carotid angioplasty and stenting (CAS) is an emerging alternative to carotid endarterectomy (CEA) for carotid artery disease. Ongoing trials compare the safety and effectiveness of CAS versus CEA.

Area of Science:

  • Vascular Surgery
  • Interventional Cardiology
  • Medical Technology

Background:

  • Carotid artery disease poses a significant risk of stroke.
  • Carotid endarterectomy (CEA) is a traditional surgical treatment.
  • Carotid angioplasty and stenting (CAS) has emerged as a less invasive alternative.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review the evolution of carotid angioplasty and stenting (CAS) techniques and materials.
  • To analyze the comparative outcomes of CAS versus carotid endarterectomy (CEA).
  • To discuss the current evidence from randomized trials and observational studies.

Main Methods:

  • Review of historical development of CAS technology.
  • Analysis of data from randomized controlled trials comparing CAS and CEA.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Synthesis of findings from observational studies on CAS and CEA.

    • Main Results:

    • Technological advancements have reduced procedural risks associated with CAS.
    • CAS procedural risks are approaching those of CEA.
    • Comparative benefits and long-term durability of CAS versus CEA are under ongoing investigation.

    Conclusions:

    • CAS represents a significant development in treating carotid artery disease.
    • Further research and randomized trials are crucial to fully establish CAS efficacy and durability.
    • Evidence suggests CAS is a viable alternative to CEA, with improving safety profiles.