Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Depolarization of diffusely reflecting man-made objects.

Brian J DeBoo1, Jose M Sasian, Russell A Chipman

  • 1Optical Sciences Center, University of Arizona, 1630 East University Boulevard, Tucson, Arizona 85721, USA. brain.deboo@goodrich.com

Applied Optics
|September 16, 2005
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Broadband extended source imaging Mueller-matrix polarimeter.

Optics letters·2019
Same author

Calibration and validation of Airborne Multiangle SpectroPolarimetric Imager (AirMSPI) polarization measurements.

Applied optics·2018
Same author

Spectral density response functions for modulated polarimeters.

Applied optics·2015
Same author

Liquid crystal polymer full-stokes division of focal plane polarimeter.

Optics express·2012
Same author

Role of the null space of the DRM in the performance of modulated polarimeters.

Optics letters·2012
Same author

Mueller matrix roots depolarization parameters.

Applied optics·2012
Same journal

Multifunctional reconfigurable terahertz metasurface based on vanadium dioxide phase transition: achieving broadband absorption and efficient polarization conversion.

Applied optics·2026
Same journal

High-Q-factor electromagnetically induced transparency utilizing quasi-bound states in the continuum in an all-dielectric terahertz metasurface.

Applied optics·2026
Same journal

Automated stitching interferometry for high-precision metrology of X-ray mirrors.

Applied optics·2026
Same journal

Experimental demonstration of an approach to designing a metal-dielectric DBR resonant cavity structure.

Applied optics·2026
Same journal

High-precision wavefront reconstruction from a single-shot interferogram using a physics-driven hybrid feature calibration network.

Applied optics·2026
Same journal

Ultra-high-Q Fano resonance based on coupled topological corner states in Kagome photonic crystals.

Applied optics·2026
See all related articles

Light depolarization from man-made surfaces follows an inverted Gaussian pattern, peaking at higher scatter angles. Circularly polarized light depolarizes more than linearly polarized light across all tested samples.

Area of Science:

  • Optics and Photonics
  • Materials Science

Background:

  • Understanding light interaction with surfaces is crucial for applications like remote sensing and optical imaging.
  • Polarization properties reveal detailed information about surface microstructures and material composition.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the polarization properties of light diffusely reflected from various man-made materials.
  • To quantify the depolarization behavior as a function of scattering geometry and incident polarization state.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized a Mueller matrix imaging polarimeter to measure the bidirectional reflectance distribution function (BRDF) for seven man-made samples.
  • Analyzed the depolarization index profiles and fitted them to Gaussian functions.
  • Compared depolarization dependence on different incident polarization states (linear and circular).

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Depolarization index profiles generally followed an inverted Gaussian function, with minimum depolarization at specular reflection.
  • Depolarization increased asymptotically with increasing scatter and incidence angles.
  • Circularly polarized light consistently showed higher depolarization than linearly polarized light across all samples.

Conclusions:

  • The Gaussian model effectively describes depolarization behavior for many man-made surfaces.
  • Incident polarization state significantly influences depolarization, with circular states being more sensitive.
  • Material properties dictate the extent of depolarization differences between linear and circular states.