Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 15, 2026

Treatment of Osteochondral Defects in the Rabbit's Knee Joint by Implantation of Allogeneic Mesenchymal Stem Cells in Fibrin Clots
Published on: May 21, 2013
Sinus floor elevation applied tissue-engineered bone. Comparative study between mesenchymal stem cells/platelet-rich
Morimichi Ohya1, Yoichi Yamada, Ryotaro Ozawa
1Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan.
Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) with platelet-rich plasma (PRP) show potential for bone regeneration in sinus floor elevation, outperforming particulate cancellous bone and marrow (PCBM) with PRP. Both methods achieved bone formation, but MSCs/PRP demonstrated better long-term outcomes.
Area of Science:
- Regenerative Medicine
- Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
- Biomaterials Science
Background:
- Sinus floor elevation is crucial for dental implant placement in the posterior maxilla.
- Tissue engineering approaches using stem cells and growth factors offer alternatives to traditional bone grafting.
- Comparing mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) with particulate cancellous bone and marrow (PCBM), both combined with platelet-rich plasma (PRP), is essential for optimizing bone regeneration.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the bone regeneration capacity of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs)/platelet-rich plasma (PRP) complexes versus particulate cancellous bone and marrow (PCBM)/PRP complexes in rabbit sinus floor elevation models.
- To evaluate the histological and histometric outcomes of these two regenerative strategies at different time points.
Main Methods:
- Bilateral sinus floor elevation was performed in 18 rabbits.
- Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) isolated from iliac crest marrow and peripheral blood platelet-rich plasma (PRP) were used in one group (MSCs/PRP).
- Particulate cancellous bone and marrow (PCBM) from the iliac crest mixed with PRP constituted the other group (PCBM/PRP).
- Animals were sacrificed at 2, 4, and 8 weeks post-transplantation for histological and histometric analysis.
Main Results:
- Both MSCs/PRP and PCBM/PRP groups exhibited new bone formation and neovascularization at 2 and 4 weeks.
- At 8 weeks, significant fatty marrow infiltration was observed in both groups.
- No significant difference in bone volume or augmented height was found between groups at each time point, but significant increases over time were noted within each group (P<0.05).
Conclusions:
- The MSCs/PRP complex demonstrates promising potential for bone regeneration in sinus floor elevation procedures.
- While both tested methods facilitate bone formation, MSCs/PRP may offer comparable or superior outcomes to PCBM/PRP for sinus augmentation.
- Further research is warranted to fully elucidate the long-term efficacy and clinical applicability of MSCs/PRP in bone regeneration.
More Related Videos
07:51Effects of Allogeneic Platelet-Rich Plasma (PRP) on the Healing Process of Sectioned Achilles Tendons of Rats: A Methodological Description
Published on: March 19, 2018
14:49Clinical Protocol of Producing Adipose Tissue-Derived Stromal Vascular Fraction for Potential Cartilage Regeneration
Published on: September 29, 2018