Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Indications for allografts.

Paul E Caldwell1, Walter R Shelton

  • 1Mississippi Sports Medicine and Orthopaedic Center, University of Mississippi of School of Medicine, 1325 East Fortification Street, Jackson, MS 39202, USA.

The Orthopedic Clinics of North America
|September 17, 2005
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Evaluation of the Femoral Condyle Radius of Curvature at the Chondral Surface Shows Significant Correlation With the Anterior-Posterior Length.

Cartilage·2025
Same author

Strong Correlation Between Femoral Condyle Radius of Curvature and Anterior-Posterior Length: Implications for Osteochondral Allograft Matching.

The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume·2024
Same author

Management of Bone Loss in Posterior Glenohumeral Shoulder Instability: Current Concepts.

JBJS reviews·2024
Same author

Arthroscopic-Assisted Intraosseous Bioplasty of the Humeral Head for Osteonecrosis.

Arthroscopy techniques·2023
Same author

Fifty-four-year follow-up of a shoulder hemiarthroplasty performed by Dr. Charles Neer: a case report and literature review.

Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery·2023
Same author

The "BioHumi" Humeral Head Osteochondral Allograft Transplantation for Reverse Hill-Sachs Lesion of the Shoulder.

Arthroscopy techniques·2023

Musculoskeletal allografts are widely used in knee reconstruction, offering benefits like reduced donor site issues and faster surgery. However, patients must consider risks such as disease transmission and longer incorporation times.

Area of Science:

  • Orthopaedic surgery
  • Biomaterials science
  • Tissue engineering

Background:

  • Musculoskeletal allografts are frequently utilized in orthopaedic knee reconstructions.
  • Over one million musculoskeletal allografts were distributed in the US in 2004.
  • Successful applications include ligament allografts, osteochondral allografts, and meniscal transplants.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review the advantages and disadvantages of using allografts in knee reconstruction.
  • To highlight the importance of patient education in the consent process for allograft procedures.

Main Methods:

  • Literature review of allograft use in knee reconstruction.
  • Analysis of benefits including reduced donor site morbidity, shorter operative times, and ease of sizing.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Evaluation of risks such as disease transmission, increased cost, and graft incorporation time.

    • Main Results:

    • Allografts offer significant advantages in knee reconstruction surgery.
    • Key benefits include no donor site morbidity, shorter surgery, and easier sizing.
    • Potential drawbacks involve disease transmission risk, higher costs, and delayed incorporation.

    Conclusions:

    • Allografts are a valuable option for knee reconstruction, providing several benefits.
    • Comprehensive patient education is crucial to weigh the advantages against the inherent risks.
    • Informed consent ensures patients understand the implications of allograft use in their treatment plan.