Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Is homeopathy a clinically valuable approach?

Edzard Ernst1

  • 1Complementary Medicine, Peninsula Medical School, Universities of Exeter & Plymouth, 25 Victoria Park Road, Exeter EX2 4NT, UK. Edzard.Ernst@pms.ac.uk

Trends in Pharmacological Sciences
|September 17, 2005
PubMed
Summary

Homeopathy lacks scientific evidence, with remedies showing no difference from placebos. Patient benefits likely stem from non-specific effects, not the remedies themselves, and risks exist.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Authoritarian attitudes and the perceived scientific legitimacy of anthroposophic medicine: A survey of attitudes on complementary and alternative medicine in Austria.

PloS one·2026
Same author

Trials and tribulations of responsible people trying to uphold scientific standards.

Research integrity and peer review·2026
Same author

WHO's category mistake.

Lancet (London, England)·2025
Same author

Spinal manipulations for migraine: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.

Systematic reviews·2024
Same author

Is Osteopathic Manipulative Treatment Clinically Superior to Sham or Placebo for Patients with Neck or Low-Back Pain? A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis.

Diseases (Basel, Switzerland)·2024
Same author

Is Craniosacral Therapy Effective? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland)·2024

Area of Science:

  • Integrative medicine
  • Complementary medicine
  • Evidence-based medicine

Background:

  • Homeopathy is a widely practiced alternative medicine system.
  • Claims of efficacy often lack robust scientific validation.
  • Understanding the true effects of homeopathic treatments is crucial.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To critically evaluate the scientific evidence supporting homeopathic remedies.
  • To differentiate between specific effects of homeopathic treatments and placebo effects.
  • To assess the overall risk-benefit profile of homeopathy.

Main Methods:

  • Systematic review of clinical trials and scientific literature on homeopathy.
  • Analysis of studies comparing homeopathic remedies to placebos.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Evaluation of reported adverse events and potential harms.

    • Main Results:

    • No conclusive evidence demonstrates homeopathic remedies are superior to placebos.
    • Observed patient benefits are primarily attributed to non-specific treatment effects.
    • Homeopathy is not without potential risks, despite its perceived safety.

    Conclusions:

    • The efficacy of homeopathic remedies beyond placebo effects is not scientifically supported.
    • Potential harms associated with homeopathic use may outweigh unproven benefits.
    • A critical, evidence-based approach is necessary when considering homeopathic treatments.