Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Vena cava filters: uses and abuses.

John E Rectenwald1

  • 1Section of Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA. jrectenw@umich.edu

Seminars in Vascular Surgery
|September 20, 2005
PubMed
Summary

Inferior vena cava (IVC) filters help prevent blood clots in patients with deep venous thrombosis (DVT) and contraindications to anticoagulation. More research is needed on retrievable IVC filters for long-term use.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Providing a Safe Pregnancy Experience for Surgeons: A Review.

JAMA surgery·2024
Same author

Evaluating the Role of Major Lower Extremity Amputation in Nonagenarians.

Annals of vascular surgery·2023
Same author

Predicting the Safety and Effectiveness of Inferior Vena Cava Filters (PRESERVE): Outcomes at 12 months.

Journal of vascular surgery. Venous and lymphatic disorders·2023
Same author

Predicting the Safety and Effectiveness of Inferior Vena Cava Filters (PRESERVE): Outcomes at 12 months.

Journal of vascular and interventional radiology : JVIR·2023
Same author

Understanding who benefits from endovascular aortic repair in those deemed unfit for open repair.

Journal of vascular surgery·2022
Same author

Trainee Reliance on Public Service Loan Forgiveness.

Journal of surgical education·2021

Area of Science:

  • Vascular Surgery
  • Interventional Radiology
  • Cardiology

Background:

  • Over 10 permanent and optional retrievable vena cava filters are used in North America and Europe.
  • Indications for inferior vena cava (IVC) filter placement include deep venous thrombosis (DVT) with anticoagulation contraindications or hemorrhage during anticoagulation.
  • Broader use of IVC filters for primary venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis is being explored.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the current landscape of IVC filter use, focusing on permanent versus optional retrievable filters.
  • To highlight the benefits and limitations of both permanent and retrievable IVC filters.
  • To identify the need for further research on retrievable IVC filter performance and utilization.

Main Methods:

  • Review of existing literature and clinical practices regarding IVC filter placement and retrieval.
  • Analysis of performance characteristics and indications for permanent IVC filters.
  • Assessment of the emerging data and challenges associated with optional retrievable IVC filters.

Main Results:

  • Permanent IVC filters are well-studied with superior performance.
  • Optional retrievable filters offer an advantage for short-term VTE risk but have limited long-term data.
  • Less than 50% of retrievable filters are actually removed, raising concerns about long-term risks.

Conclusions:

  • The optimal choice between permanent and retrievable IVC filters remains debated.
  • Long-term performance data for retrievable IVC filters used permanently is lacking.
  • Prospective, randomized trials are essential to guide the selection and use of IVC filters.

Related Experiment Videos