Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 15, 2026

Low-Cost Alternative for Examining Social Preference in Zebrafish (Danio rerio) Using the 3-Chamber Open-Tank Free-Swim Task
Published on: August 7, 2026
Natural selection and social preferences
Jörgen W Weibull1, Marcus Salomonsson
1Stockholm School of Economics, Box 6501, SE-113 83 Stockholm, Sweden. jorgen.weibull@hhs.se
Abstract:
A large number of individuals are randomly matched into groups, where each group plays a finite symmetric game. Individuals breed true. The expected number of surviving offspring depends on own material payoff, but may also, due to cooperative breeding and/or reproductive competition, depend on the material payoffs to other group members. The induced population dynamic is equivalent with the replicator dynamic for a game with payoffs derived from those in the original game. We apply this selection dynamic to a number of examples, including prisoners' dilemma games with and without a punishment option, coordination games, and hawk-dove games. For each of these, we compare the outcomes with those obtained under the standard replicator dynamic. By way of a revealed-preference argument, our selection dynamic can explain certain "altruistic" and "spiteful" behaviors that are consistent with individuals having social preferences.
Related Concept Videos
Natural Selection and Mating Preferences
Females, due to their biological roles in conception, pregnancy, and nursing, inherently...
Types of Selection
What is Natural Selection?
Natural Selection and Adaptation
Beyond physical adaptations, psychological...
Limits to Natural Selection
Frequency-dependent Selection

