Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Political polarization.

Avinash K Dixit1, Jörgen W Weibull

  • 1Department of Economics, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08544, USA. dixitak@princeton.edu

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
|April 25, 2007
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Airborne disease transmission during indoor gatherings over multiple time scales: Modeling framework and policy implications.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2023
Same author

Localized prosocial preferences, public goods, and common-pool resources.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2018
Same author

Dynamics of social, political, and economic institutions.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2011
Same author

A generalization of Hamilton's rule--love others how much?

Journal of theoretical biology·2011
Same author

Natural selection and social preferences.

Journal of theoretical biology·2005

Government policy failures cause divided public opinion. This study explains policy polarization using a natural bimodality of preferences, consistent with Bayesian rationality.

Area of Science:

  • Political Science
  • Behavioral Economics
  • Decision Theory

Background:

  • Government policy failures frequently elicit divergent public responses.
  • Citizens often react to policy failures by either demanding policy reversal or advocating for intensified implementation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To explain the observed polarization in public reactions to government policies.
  • To propose a theoretical framework for understanding why citizens react oppositely to policy failures.

Main Methods:

  • The study employs a theoretical approach grounded in Bayesian rationality.
  • It models public preferences as naturally bimodal in political and economic contexts.

Main Results:

  • A natural bimodality of preferences can explain the polarization of public opinion following policy failures.

Related Experiment Videos

  • This framework is consistent with rational decision-making under uncertainty.

    • Conclusions:

    • The proposed model provides a parsimonious explanation for policy-related public polarization.
    • Understanding preference bimodality is key to comprehending reactions to government policy outcomes.