Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 12, 2026

05:59
Visualization of Intensity Levels to Reduce the Gap Between Self-Reported and Directly Measured Physical Activity
Published on: March 7, 2019
Low physical activity among adolescents in practical education
M Westerståhl1, M Barnekow-Bergkvist, E Jansson
1Department of Laboratory Medicine, Division of Clinical Physiology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden. maria.westerstahl@labmed.ki.se
Scandinavian Journal of Medicine & Science in Sports
|September 27, 2005
Summary
Students in practical secondary school programs have lower physical activity levels than those in theoretical programs. Interventions should target practical program students, especially girls, to improve adolescent physical activity.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric Exercise Science
- Adolescent Health
- Educational Psychology
Background:
- Physical activity is crucial for adolescent health and well-being.
- Variations in physical activity levels exist among different secondary school programs.
- Understanding factors influencing these variations is key for targeted interventions.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate physical activity levels in 16-year-old students across Swedish secondary school practical and theoretical programs.
- To identify factors associated with physical activity differences between these educational programs.
- To explore gender-specific physical activity patterns within each program type.
Main Methods:
- Systematic selection of 585 first-year secondary school students (16-year-olds) in Sweden.
- High participation rate (93%) achieved through questionnaire completion.
- Statistical analysis to compare physical activity levels and identify influencing factors.
Main Results:
- Students in practical programs exhibited lower daily physical activity (time and energy expenditure) compared to theoretical programs.
- Girls in practical programs were the least active; boys in theoretical programs were the most active.
- Factors explaining lower activity in practical programs included lower socio-economic status, reduced parental support, poorer perceived health, and negative attitudes toward outdoor activities.
Conclusions:
- Physical activity promotion efforts should prioritize students in practical programs, particularly girls.
- School-based interventions are recommended due to the influence of parental support on physical activity levels.
- Addressing socio-economic, familial, and attitudinal factors is essential for enhancing adolescent physical activity.

