Single-dose ciprofloxacin versus 12-dose erythromycin for childhood cholera: a randomised controlled trial

Debasish Saha1, Wasif A Khan, Mohammad M Karim

  • 1ICDDR, B, Centre for Health and Population Research, Dhaka, Bangladesh. dsaha@icddrb.org

Lancet (London, England)
|September 27, 2005
PubMed

Insights

Single-dose ciprofloxacin offers similar clinical cure rates for severe childhood cholera compared to erythromycin. However, ciprofloxacin was less effective in eradicating Vibrio cholerae bacteria from stool samples.

Area of Science:

  • Pediatric Infectious Diseases
  • Antimicrobial Therapy
  • Gastroenterology

Background:

  • Severe cholera in children requires effective treatment.
  • Ciprofloxacin is a potential single-dose option for cholera treatment.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the efficacy of single-dose ciprofloxacin versus multi-dose erythromycin for treating severe cholera in children.
  • To assess clinical cure rates and bacterial eradication.

Main Methods:

  • A randomized, open-label trial involving children aged 2-15 years with severe cholera.
  • Participants received either single-dose ciprofloxacin or 12 doses of erythromycin over 3 days.
  • Clinical success was defined as cessation of watery stools within 48 hours.

Main Results:

  • Clinical success rates were similar: 60% for ciprofloxacin and 55% for erythromycin.
  • Ciprofloxacin group experienced less vomiting, fewer stools, and reduced stool volume.
  • Bacteriological failure was significantly higher with ciprofloxacin (58%) compared to erythromycin (30%).

Conclusions:

  • Single-dose ciprofloxacin provides comparable clinical outcomes to multi-dose erythromycin for childhood cholera.
  • Erythromycin demonstrated superior efficacy in eradicating Vibrio cholerae.
  • Further research may be needed to optimize ciprofloxacin use or explore alternatives for bacterial clearance.
Abstract

Related Concept Videos

Blinding01:11

Blinding

Blinding is a commonly used method of not telling participants which treatment a subject is receiving. Blinding is a critical part of a randomized control trial or RCT. It reduces the bias that affects the results. In an RCT, blinding is used in the form of a placebo. A placebo effect occurs when untreated subjects falsely believe they have received the treatment and report improved symptoms. A placebo or a dummy treatment is administered to subjects to negate the bias caused by such an effect.
Bioavailability Study Design: Single Versus Multiple Dose Studies01:11

Bioavailability Study Design: Single Versus Multiple Dose Studies

Bioavailability studies are essential for understanding how a drug is absorbed, distributed, metabolized, and excreted in the body. These studies assess the extent and rate at which the active pharmaceutical agent becomes available at the site of action. The design of bioavailability studies can involve single-dose or multiple-dose regimens, each with distinct advantages and limitations.Single-dose studies are the preferred approach due to their simplicity and reduced drug exposure for...
Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Completely Randomized and Randomized Block Designs01:20

Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Completely Randomized and Randomized Block Designs

Bioequivalence experimental study designs are crucial methodologies used in evaluating and comparing the bioavailability of different drug products. These designs are categorized into various types: completely randomized, randomized block, repeated measures, cross and carry-over, and Latin square designs.Completely randomized designs involve randomly allocating treatments to all subjects participating in the experiment. This allocation is achieved by assigning unique random numbers to subjects...
Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Repeated Measures, Cross-Over, Carry-Over, and Latin Square Designs01:15

Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Repeated Measures, Cross-Over, Carry-Over, and Latin Square Designs

Bioequivalence experimental study designs play a pivotal role in testing the effectiveness of various treatments. Key among these are the repeated measures, cross-over, carry-over, and Latin square designs. In the repeated measures design, each subject receives all treatments, allowing for temporal comparisons. This type of design is useful in reducing variability but requires careful planning to avoid bias.The cross-over design, an economical method, involves sequential administration of...
Pharmacokinetics in Pediatric Patients: Drug Excretion01:26

Pharmacokinetics in Pediatric Patients: Drug Excretion

In pediatric medicine, understanding the renal function and drug elimination nuances is crucial for administering safe and effective treatments. Newborns, in particular, display markedly slower renal functions than adults, profoundly affecting how drugs are cleared from their bodies. This slower drug clearance requires clinicians to extend the dosing intervals for many medications to prevent drug accumulation and toxicity while ensuring therapeutic efficacy.One key area where these adjustments...
Hazard Ratio01:12

Hazard Ratio

The hazard ratio (HR) is a widely used measure in clinical trials to compare the risk of events, such as death or disease recurrence, between two groups over time. It reflects the ratio of hazard rates—the instantaneous risk of the event occurring—between a treatment group and a control group. This measure provides valuable insights into the relative effectiveness of a treatment by assessing how the risk of an event differs between the two groups.
For example, in a clinical trial evaluating a...