Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Occupational disease in Connecticut: 2002.

Tim Morse1, John D Meyer, Thomas St Louis

  • 1Division of Occupational and Environmental Medicine and Community Medicine, University of Connecticut Health Center, USA.

Connecticut Medicine
|September 28, 2005
PubMed
Summary

Connecticut physicians under-reported occupational diseases in 2002, with only half the estimated cases documented. Key conditions included musculoskeletal disorders and lead poisoning, highlighting a significant surveillance gap.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

American Board of Preventive Medicine Updated Occupational and Environmental Medicine Examination Content and Practice Analysis.

Journal of occupational and environmental medicine·2023
Same author

Occupation and Semen Parameters in a Cohort of Fertile Men.

Journal of occupational and environmental medicine·2022
Same author

Adolescents with Sport-Related Concussion Who Adhere to Aerobic Exercise Prescriptions Recover Faster.

Medicine and science in sports and exercise·2022
Same author

Providing pharmacy services in a basketball arena: Reflections on building a pharmacy in a COVID-19 surge facility.

American journal of health-system pharmacy : AJHP : official journal of the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists·2021
Same author

Opportunities at the intersection of work and health: Developing the occupational data for health information model.

Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA·2020
Same author

Epidemiology, Injury Patterns, and Treatment of Meniscal Tears in Pediatric Patients: A 16-Year Experience of a Single Center.

Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine·2020

Area of Science:

  • Occupational Health
  • Public Health Surveillance
  • Epidemiology

Background:

  • Occupational diseases pose a significant public health burden.
  • Accurate surveillance data is crucial for understanding and mitigating work-related health risks.
  • Previous data collection methods in Connecticut may not fully capture the scope of occupational illnesses.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compile and analyze data on chronic work-related conditions in Connecticut for 2002.
  • To compare physician reports with estimates from other surveillance methodologies.
  • To identify trends and emerging occupational health issues.

Main Methods:

  • Data compiled from physician reports to the Occupational Disease Surveillance System (ODSS).
  • Inclusion of data from the Workers' Compensation (WC) Commission and the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS)/ ConnOSHA survey.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Analysis of reported cases by condition type, including musculoskeletal disorders, lead poisoning, skin disorders, and respiratory conditions.

    • Main Results:

    • Physicians reported 2,082 cases, significantly lower than the estimated 4,388 cases using BLS/ConnOSHA methodology.
    • Musculoskeletal disorders (44%), adult lead poisonings (22%), skin disorders (16%), and respiratory conditions (13%) were the most frequent diagnoses.
    • Increased reporting in ODSS and WC systems compared to 2001; emerging issues included vibration-related MSD, mold outbreaks, and Lyme disease.
    • Only 86 physicians reported cases, indicating widespread under-reporting despite mandatory reporting statutes.

    Conclusions:

    • Significant under-reporting of occupational diseases by Connecticut physicians was evident in 2002.
    • Existing surveillance systems may underestimate the true incidence of work-related conditions.
    • Further investigation and improved physician engagement are needed to enhance occupational disease surveillance.