Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Standards for evaluating proposals to develop ethics curricula.

Vivian Weil1

  • 1Center for the Study of Ethics in the Professions, Illinois Institute of Technology, Chicago 60616, USA. weil@iit.edu

Science and Engineering Ethics
|September 30, 2005
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Barking up the wrong tree? Industry funding of academic research. A case study with commentaries.

Science and engineering ethics·2003
Same author

Making sense of scientists' responsibilities at the interface of science and society. Commentary on "Six Domains of Research Ethics".

Science and engineering ethics·2002
Same author

Ethics and relationships in laboratories and research communities.

Professional ethics (Gainesville, Fla.)·1995
Same author

Sharing scientific data II: normative issues.

IRB·1990
Same journal

Not Another Grocery List: Proposals for an Effective AI Ethics Implementation.

Science and engineering ethics·2026
Same journal

From Biopiracy to Sustainable Knowledge Governance: Epistemic Justice and the Reconstruction of Resource Sovereignty in the Global South.

Science and engineering ethics·2026
Same journal

Deliberative Lab Communication and the Practice of Ethical Science.

Science and engineering ethics·2026
Same journal

Graduate Students Find Content of Responsible Conduct of Research Coursework Useful.

Science and engineering ethics·2026
Same journal

Discursive Ethics as a Normative Foundation for Integrating Ethics into AI Clinical Decision Support Systems.

Science and engineering ethics·2026
Same journal

Tragedies of Technology: An Exploration of Such Narratives.

Science and engineering ethics·2026
See all related articles

Developing standards for online ethics courses can improve teaching quality. Key evaluation criteria include intellectual merit, broad impact, and interactive learning, crucial for advancing online education.

Area of Science:

  • Online Education
  • Pedagogy
  • Ethics Education

Background:

  • Online teaching requires specific standards for quality assurance.
  • Assessing online courses, particularly in practical and professional ethics, presents unique challenges.
  • Improving the overall quality of online instruction is an ongoing goal in higher education.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To establish standards for evaluating proposals for online teaching of practical and professional ethics.
  • To provide an approach for raising the general standard of online teaching.
  • To identify key criteria for assessing the quality of online educational offerings.

Main Methods:

  • Focus on developing standards for proposal assessment in online ethics education.
  • Utilizing criteria such as intellectual merit, broad impact, and research-teaching integration.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Emphasis on evaluating the level of interactivity within online courses.

    • Main Results:

    • Intellectual merit, broad impact, and high interactivity are identified as crucial evaluation criteria.
    • Research supporting instructor preparation, content enrichment, and further inquiry is particularly valuable.
    • Easy access and navigability within the online curriculum are essential for elevating online teaching.

    Conclusions:

    • Standards for assessing online ethics courses offer a framework for improving online pedagogy.
    • Interactivity and robust research integration are key indicators of high-quality online instruction.
    • Enhancing online curriculum accessibility and navigation is vital for advancing online teaching effectiveness.