Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 17, 2026

Radiation Planning Assistant - A Web-based Tool to Support High-quality Radiotherapy in Clinics with Limited Resources
Published on: October 6, 2023
Radiology Residency Selection in the Era of Program Signals: A National Survey of Interview Selection and Ranking
Madeline Stewart1, Sherief Ghozy2, Karuna Raj3
1The Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA (M.S., E.N.G.).
Rationale And Objectives:
To assess radiology residency program leadership perspectives on factors influencing interview selection and final ranking during the 2025-2026 Match, emphasizing preference signals, letters of intent, visiting rotations, virtual interviews, and academic metrics.
Materials And Methods:
A cross-sectional anonymous survey was distributed to program directors of ACGME-accredited Diagnostic Radiology and Interventional Radiology-Integrated residency programs participating in the 2026 Residency Match. Program directors were asked to complete the survey and distribute it to individuals involved in applicant interviewing or ranking. Items assessed program characteristics, application review factors, preference signals, letters of intent, visiting rotations, and interview format perceptions. Descriptive statistics were used, with exploratory subgroup comparisons performed using chi-square or Fisher's exact tests.
Results:
The final analytic cohort included 85 respondents. The most highly weighted interview selection factors were first-attempt pass on USMLE Step 1/COMLEX Level 1, USMLE Step 2 CK/COMLEX Level 2 CE score, and Gold/Silver preference signals, rated highly considered or essential by 90.6%, 88.2%, and 87.1%, respectively. For final ranking, overall interview impression was rated highly considered or essential by 94.1% and selected among the most significant factors by 91.8%. Letters of intent had limited overall influence, although 35.3% reported ranking an applicant higher because of one. Visiting rotations positively influenced ranking for 77.6%. Fully virtual interviews were used by 91.8%, but 44.7% reported a negative effect on applicant evaluation.
Conclusion:
Standardized examination performance and preference signals strongly influence interview selection, whereas interview performance dominates final ranking. Away rotations remain influential, while letters of intent appear most impactful in closely contested ranking decisions.
Related Concept Videos
Radiological Investigation I: X-ray and CT
Radiological Investigation III: Pulmonary Angiogram and PET Scan
Pulmonary Angiogram
A Pulmonary Angiogram is an invasive procedure involving injecting a contrast medium through a catheter threaded into the pulmonary artery or the right side of the heart to visualize the pulmonary vasculature. Computed Tomography (CT) scans have mainly replaced this...
Radiological Investigation II: MRI and Ventilation Perfusion Scan
Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) and Ventilation Perfusion Scans are two radiological investigations that offer detailed diagnostic images of the body, particularly lung structures.
MRI
MRI uses magnetic fields and radiofrequency signals to distinguish between normal and abnormal tissues. This technology provides a more detailed diagnostic image than CT scans, enabling it to characterize pulmonary nodules, stage bronchogenic carcinoma, and evaluate inflammatory activity in...
Positron Emission Tomography
One of the main requirements of a PET scan is a positron-emitting radioisotope, which is produced in a cyclotron and then attached to a substance used by the part of the body being...
X-ray Imaging
