Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Using posterior composites appropriately.

J L Ferracane1

  • 1Department of Dental Materials Science, School of Dentistry, Oregon Health Sciences University, Portland 97201-3097.

Journal of the American Dental Association (1939)
|July 1, 1992
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Generative AI: Opportunities, Risks, and Responsibilities for Oral Sciences.

Journal of dental research·2025
Same author

An Assessment of 1067 Light Curing Units Measured Twice Between 2015 and 2021.

The European journal of prosthodontics and restorative dentistry·2024
Same author

Triacrylamide-Based Adhesives Stabilize Bonds in Physiologic Conditions.

Journal of dental research·2022
Same author

Interface between Materials and Oral Biology.

Journal of dental research·2021
Same author

Biomaterial and Biofilm Interactions with the Pulp-Dentin Complex-on-a-Chip.

Journal of dental research·2021
Same author

Effects of systematically varied thiourethane-functionalized filler concentration on polymerization behavior and relevant clinical properties of dental composites.

Materials & design·2020
Same journal

Functional and patient-reported outcomes of 3-dimensional-printed vs conventionally fabricated complete dentures: A randomized crossover clinical trial.

Journal of the American Dental Association (1939)·2026
Same journal

Interradicular multilocular radiolucency of the anterior mandible.

Journal of the American Dental Association (1939)·2026
Same journal

Dental manifestations of rare skeletal disorders: Diagnosis and treatment for the oral health care provider.

Journal of the American Dental Association (1939)·2026
Same journal

Beyond risk of bias: Strengthening systematic reviews in dentistry through structured trustworthiness assessment of randomized controlled trials.

Journal of the American Dental Association (1939)·2026
Same journal

Severity and financial outcomes associated with dental diagnostic errors in paid malpractice claims in the United States from 2004 through 2021.

Journal of the American Dental Association (1939)·2026
Same journal

Glycated hemoglobin levels in participants with diabetes and oral disease enrolled in the All of Us Research Program.

Journal of the American Dental Association (1939)·2026
See all related articles

This guide helps determine when to use posterior composite restorations, as their success rates differ between clinical studies and general dental practice. It clarifies material selection for optimal outcomes.

Area of Science:

  • Dentistry
  • Dental Materials Science

Background:

  • Posterior composite restorations are widely used in restorative dentistry.
  • Variability exists in reported success rates of these restorations.
  • Clinical study outcomes may not always align with real-world practitioner experiences.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To provide a clinical guide for selecting posterior composite materials.
  • To elucidate factors influencing the success rates of posterior composite restorations.
  • To bridge the gap between clinical research findings and practical application.

Main Methods:

  • Literature review of clinical studies on posterior composite restorations.
  • Analysis of practitioner-reported data and case studies.
  • Development of evidence-based decision-making criteria.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Success rates in clinical studies are often higher than those reported in general practice.
  • Material properties, cavity preparation, and placement techniques significantly impact longevity.
  • Specific indications and contraindications for different composite types were identified.

Conclusions:

  • Careful patient selection and appropriate material choice are crucial for successful posterior composite restorations.
  • Understanding the differences between study and practice settings is key for practitioners.
  • This guide aids clinicians in optimizing the use of posterior composites for improved patient outcomes.