Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Three approaches to qualitative content analysis.

Hsiu-Fang Hsieh1, Sarah E Shannon

  • 1Fooyin University, Kaohsiung Hsien, Taiwan.

Qualitative Health Research
|October 6, 2005
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

A closer look at the role of apology in error disclosure: a simulation study.

Frontiers in health services·2025
Same author

Insisting on help, facing challenges, and maintaining balance: The lived experiences of caregivers raising a child with developmental delay in the remote islands of Kinmen.

Journal of pediatric nursing·2023
Same author

A Quality Improvement Project to Identify Patients With Advanced Heart Failure for Potential Palliative Care Referral in Telemetry and Cardiac Intensive Care Units.

Journal of doctoral nursing practice·2020
Same author

Forensic Medical Examinations: Imagining Justice.

Journal of forensic nursing·2019
Same author

Interprofessional Error Disclosure Training for Medical, Nursing, Pharmacy, Dental, and Physician Assistant Students.

MedEdPORTAL : the journal of teaching and learning resources·2019
Same author

"Hot Seat" Simulation Model for Conflict Resolution: A Pilot Study.

Journal for healthcare quality : official publication of the National Association for Healthcare Quality·2018

Content analysis, a qualitative research method, offers three distinct approaches: conventional, directed, and summative. Each method interprets text data using unique coding schemes and trustworthiness strategies, aiding in research analysis.

Area of Science:

  • Qualitative Research Methodologies
  • Textual Data Analysis
  • Scientific Research Techniques

Background:

  • Content analysis is a prevalent qualitative research technique.
  • Existing applications demonstrate three distinct approaches: conventional, directed, and summative.
  • All approaches interpret meaning from text data within a naturalistic paradigm.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To differentiate three distinct approaches to content analysis: conventional, directed, and summative.
  • To delineate specific analytic procedures for each approach.
  • To present techniques for addressing trustworthiness in content analysis.

Main Methods:

  • Conventional content analysis: deriving coding categories directly from text data.
  • Directed content analysis: using existing theory or research for initial codes.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Summative content analysis: counting and comparing content, followed by contextual interpretation.

    • Main Results:

    • Identified key differences among the three approaches, including coding schemes, code origins, and trustworthiness.
    • Provided hypothetical examples from end-of-life care to illustrate each approach.
    • Outlined procedures and trustworthiness techniques specific to each content analysis method.

    Conclusions:

    • Content analysis is not monolithic but comprises distinct conventional, directed, and summative approaches.
    • Understanding these differences is crucial for appropriate application and rigorous qualitative research.
    • The study provides a framework for applying and evaluating content analysis methods effectively.