Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Subitizing: magical numbers or mere superstition?

J D Balakrishnan1, F G Ashby

  • 1Department of Psychology, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL 60208.

Psychological Research
|January 1, 1992
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Decision criteria do not shift: commentary on Mueller and Weidemann (2008).

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2008
Same author

Is the area measure a historical anomaly?

Canadian journal of experimental psychology = Revue canadienne de psychologie experimentale·2003
Same author

Intelligibility of speech in a virtual 3-D environment.

Human factors·2002
Same author

On the nature of implicit categorization.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2002
Same author

The effects of concurrent task interference on category learning: evidence for multiple category learning systems.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2001
Same author

Suboptimality in human categorization and identification.

Journal of experimental psychology. General·2001
Same journal

Poorer event-based compared to time-based prospective memory in a computerized household chores task.

Psychological research·2026
Same journal

Self-other discrimination in face recognition depending on personal familiarity: investigating a sample consisting of Japanese and Han Chinese women.

Psychological research·2026
Same journal

Sounds of creativity: musical, creative, and language factors associated with singing and creative singing.

Psychological research·2026
Same journal

Does sport expertise bridge the sex gap in mental rotation? Bayesian evidence for the critical role of visuospatial demands.

Psychological research·2026
Same journal

The development of an optimal learning strategy for high-similarity categories: the effect of example sequence on children's category learning.

Psychological research·2026
Same journal

Musical training increases anticipatory responding and predictive control in sequence learning.

Psychological research·2026
See all related articles

Subitizing, the rapid apprehension of small set numerosity, may not involve a special process. Statistical analyses of response time data found no evidence for a discontinuity, challenging the subitizing range theory.

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Human Perception

Background:

  • The concept of subitizing suggests humans possess a specialized numerical process for rapid, accurate numerosity apprehension of small object sets.
  • Evidence for subitizing often relies on a perceived discontinuity in response time (RT) versus numerosity curves around 4 elements.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To statistically analyze response time data from a speeded enumeration experiment.
  • To investigate the existence of a discontinuity in RT as numerosity increases, specifically challenging the subitizing range.

Main Methods:

  • Collected response time (RT) data during a speeded enumeration task.
  • Applied various statistical analyses to the RT data, including tests on RT distributions.
  • Examined RT trends across increasing display numerosity.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • No statistically significant discontinuity in RT was found as numerosity increased.
  • Data indicated a strong stochastic dominance of RT by display numerosity.
  • Evidence suggests mental effort in enumeration increases with each element, irrespective of the putative subitizing range.

Conclusions:

  • The findings challenge the widely held belief in a specialized subitizing process.
  • The data support a continuous increase in cognitive load with set size during enumeration.
  • Further research is needed to understand the mechanisms underlying numerical cognition beyond small set sizes.