Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 15, 2026
Protocol for Relative Hydrodynamic Assessment of Tri-leaflet Polymer Valves
Published on: October 17, 2013
Different tilting disc valves show similar rotation-dependent impairment in hemodynamic performance under a tilted
M Hartrumpf1, R U Kuehnel, R Puchner
1Heart Center Brandenburg, Bernau/Berlin, Germany. m.hartrumpf@immanuel.de
Background:
Aortic annulus calcification can promote tilted implantation of mechanical valves. This study evaluates the hemodynamics of tilting disc valves under this condition.
Methods:
23 mm and 25 mm Ultracor (UC) and Medtronic-Hall-Easy-Fit (MH) valves were investigated in a pulse-duplicator under physiological conditions. Mean pressure gradient (dP(mean)), systolic energy loss (dW(sys)), effective orifice area (EOA), closure (V(Cl)), leakage (V(L)), and total regurgitation volume (V(R)) were assessed. Valves were independently positioned at five axial rotations (0 - 180 degrees , zero defined as major orifice facing the top of the "tilt-ramp") and three tilt angles (0 degrees, 10 degrees, 20 degrees) by lifting the prosthesis in the noncoronary sinus.
Results:
Diameter-enhanced MH valves exhibited a better systolic performance but a higher regurgitation than corresponding UC valves. Moderate tilting showed a rotation-independent increase in dP(mean) and dW(sys) and a decrease in V (R) and EOA with no fundamental differences between valve types. Further tilting caused small additional changes at 90 - 180 degrees rotation. At 0 degrees rotation, however, dramatic regurgitation occurred throughout.
Conclusion:
Tilting worsened systolic performance regardless of valve type. It should therefore be avoided. Due to extensive regurgitation at 0 degrees rotation, this position should be corrected whenever tilting is inevitable.
