General dental practitioners' views on the use of stainless steel crowns to restore primary molars
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 15, 2026
Quasistatic Mechanical Testing for Computer-Aided Design and Manufacturing Occlusal Veneers Cemented to Milled Dentin Analog Material
Published on: December 20, 2024
A G Threlfall1, L Pilkington, K M Milsom
1DH Research Training Fellow, Oral Health Unit, National Primary Care R and D Centre, Manchester University Dental School, Higher Cambridge Street, Manchester, M15 6LP, UK. tony.threlfall@man.ac.uk
Aim:
To ascertain general dental practitioners' views on the use of stainless steel (pre-formed metal) crowns to restore carious primary molars.
Method:
Ninety-three general dental practitioners were selected at random from those practising in Lancashire, Cheshire and Greater Manchester in 2003 and interviewed separately about the clinical care they provide to the primary dentition. Before the interview participants recorded the care they would provide for a case scenario, describing a child with a carious lesion that the British Society of Paediatric Dentistry (BSPD) guidelines indicate should be treated with a stainless steel crown.
Results:
In answering the case scenario only six (7%) of the dentists reported that they would fit a stainless steel crown. Of the 93 dentists interviewed 71% knew of the BSPD guidelines, but only 18% had ever fitted a stainless steel crown in general practice. Reasons given for not using stainless steel crowns were they are inappropriate for many children, time consuming to fit, difficult to manipulate, expensive, and ugly.
Conclusion:
The BSPD guidelines on the use of stainless steel crowns do not reflect the views of the majority of general dental practitioners who consider these crowns unsuitable for most children and an impractical restorative technique in busy daily practice.
