Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Automaticity and the ACT* theory.

J R Anderson1

  • 1Carnegie Mellon University.

The American Journal of Psychology
|January 1, 1992
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study explains automaticity using Adaptive Control of Thought (ACT*) theory. It demonstrates how ACT* accounts for automaticity phenomena without a dedicated mechanism, advancing cognitive theory.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Systemic anaplastic large-cell lymphoma: results from the non-Hodgkin's lymphoma classification project.

American journal of hematology·2001
Same author

Antiretroviral treatment in pregnancy.

The Hopkins HIV report : a bimonthly newsletter for healthcare providers·2001
Same author

Report from Geneva: women and HIV.

The Hopkins HIV report : a bimonthly newsletter for healthcare providers·2001
Same author

Cesarean section and perinatal transmission.

The Hopkins HIV report : a bimonthly newsletter for healthcare providers·2001
Same author

Outcomes of treatment of children and adolescents with recurrent non-Hodgkin's lymphoma and Hodgkin's disease with dexamethasone, etoposide, cisplatin, cytarabine, and l-asparaginase, maintenance chemotherapy, and transplantation: Children's Cancer Group Study CCG-5912.

Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology·2001
Same author

Does learning a complex task have to be complex? A study in learning decomposition.

Cognitive psychology·2001
Same journal

Attributing social meaning to animated shapes: A new experimental study of apparent behavior.

The American journal of psychology·2021
Same journal

Scientific Study of Magic: Binet's Pioneering Approach Based on Observations and Chronophotography.

The American journal of psychology·2018
Same journal

Child and Ancient Man: How to Define Their Commonalities and Differences.

The American journal of psychology·2018
Same journal

Adolescent Aggression as Predicted from Parent-Child Relationships and Executive Functions.

The American journal of psychology·2018
Same journal

The Effect of Collective Transitions on the Organization and Contents of Autobiographical Memory: A Transition Theory Perspective.

The American journal of psychology·2018
Same journal

The Development and Validity of a Chinese Version of the Compound Remote Associates Test.

The American journal of psychology·2018
See all related articles

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Cognitive Science
  • Computational Psychology

Background:

  • Automaticity is a key concept in cognitive psychology, referring to tasks performed with speed, accuracy, and without conscious effort.
  • Existing theories often propose specific mechanisms for automaticity, but a unified explanation remains elusive.
  • The Adaptive Control of Thought (ACT*) theory offers a comprehensive framework for understanding human cognition and learning.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To explain the phenomenon of automaticity within the theoretical framework of the Adaptive Control of Thought (ACT*) production system.
  • To investigate whether ACT* can account for the observable characteristics of automaticity without positing a distinct automaticity module.
  • To bridge the gap between natural language concepts of automaticity and formal computational models of cognition.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Methods:

  • Identification and analysis of the core phenomena associated with automaticity in cognitive tasks.
  • Overview of the fundamental principles and architecture of the Adaptive Control of Thought (ACT*) theory.
  • Theoretical integration: explaining how ACT*'s existing mechanisms can generate behaviors characteristic of automaticity.

Main Results:

  • The study posits that ACT* does not contain a specific 'automaticity mechanism'.
  • It demonstrates that the existing components and processes within ACT* are sufficient to explain the phenomena of automaticity.
  • Automaticity emerges from the interaction of learning, memory retrieval, and production compilation within the ACT* framework.

Conclusions:

  • Automaticity in cognitive tasks can be fully explained by the Adaptive Control of Thought (ACT*) theory's existing mechanisms.
  • The absence of a dedicated automaticity module in ACT* aligns with the principle that scientific theories need not directly map to everyday language concepts.
  • This provides a parsimonious and computationally grounded account of automaticity, enhancing the explanatory power of ACT*.