Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 15, 2026

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting (Propensity Score) using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
Published on: January 8, 2020
Measuring relative disparities in terms of adverse events
Kenneth G Keppel1, Jeffrey N Pearcy
1Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Health Statistics, Hyattsville, MD 20782, USA. kkeppel@cdc.gov
Objectives:
To compare relative measures of disparity in rates of favorable events with those in rates of adverse events.
Methods:
Relative measures of disparity are applied to four health indicators to demonstrate how the size of a disparity between groups, and changes in disparity over time, depend on whether indicators are expressed in terms of favorable or adverse events.
Results:
The size of an absolute measure of disparity is the same whether favorable or adverse events are studied. The size of a relative measure of disparity depends on the rate for each group and the reference point from which the disparity is measured. The rates for each group and for the reference point depend on whether the indicator is expressed in terms of favorable or adverse events. Relative measures of disparity, and conclusions about changes in relative measures of disparity, depend on whether indicators are expressed in terms of favorable or adverse events.
Conclusions:
When relative measures of disparity are used to monitor changes in disparity over time or to compare disparities across different indicators, disparities should be measured in terms of adverse events.
Related Concept Videos
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast, controlled...
Relative Risk
Odds Ratio
Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups
Hazard Rate
Hazard Ratio
For example, in a clinical trial evaluating a...

