Prospective study comparing three-dimensional computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging for evaluating the renal vascular anatomy in potential living renal donors
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 15, 2026

Anatomical Reconstructions of the Human Cardiac Venous System using Contrast-computed Tomography of Perfusion-fixed Specimens
Published on: April 18, 2013
Aftab A Bhatti1, Aamir Chugtai, Philip Haslam
1Department of Urology, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne NE7 7DN, UK.
Insights
Multislice spiral computed tomographic angiography (CTA) is more accurate than magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) for evaluating renal vascular anatomy in living kidney donors. CTA offers superior detection of accessory renal arteries and veins.
Area of Science:
- Radiology
- Medical Imaging
- Nephrology
Background:
- Accurate pre-operative assessment of renal vascular anatomy is crucial for successful kidney donation.
- Living kidney donors require detailed imaging to identify potential complications and ensure donor safety.
Purpose of the Study:
- To prospectively compare the diagnostic accuracy of multislice spiral computed tomographic angiography (CTA) and magnetic resonance angiography (MRA).
- To evaluate the efficacy of CTA and MRA in depicting renal arterial and venous anatomy in potential living renal donors.
Main Methods:
- Thirty-one potential living renal donors underwent both CTA and gadolinium-enhanced MRA.
- Axial images, multiplanar reconstructions, and maximum intensity projections were utilized for anatomical display.
- Radiological findings were correlated with surgical outcomes following donor nephrectomy.
Main Results:
- CTA demonstrated 100% sensitivity for renal arteries and 97% for renal veins, compared to MRA's 97% and 94% respectively.
- CTA detected all accessory renal arteries (100%) and veins (100%), significantly outperforming MRA (33% and 67% respectively).
- CTA showed higher sensitivity for detecting left lumbar and gonadal veins compared to MRA.
Conclusions:
- Multislice spiral CTA with 3D reconstruction is more accurate than MRA for assessing renal arterial and venous anatomy in potential living kidney donors.
- CTA provides superior visualization of accessory renal vasculature, which is critical for surgical planning.
Objective:
To prospectively compare the accuracy of multislice spiral computed tomographic angiography (CTA) and magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) in evaluating the renal vascular anatomy in potential living renal donors.
Subjects And Methods:
Thirty-one donors underwent multislice spiral CTA and gadolinium-enhanced MRA. In addition to axial images, multiplanar reconstruction and maximum intensity projections were used to display the renal vascular anatomy. Twenty-four donors had a left laparoscopic donor nephrectomy (LDN), whereas seven had right open donor nephrectomy (ODN); LDN was only considered if the renal vascular anatomy was favourable on the left. CTA and MRA images were analysed by two radiologists independently. The radiological and surgical findings were correlated after the surgery.
Results:
CTA showed 33 arteries and 32 veins (100% sensitivity) whereas MRA showed 32 arteries and 31 veins (97% sensitivity). CTA detected all five accessory renal arteries whereas MRA only detected one. CTA also identified all three accessory renal veins whereas MRA identified two. CTA had a sensitivity of 97% and 47% for left lumbar and left gonadal veins, whereas MRA had a sensitivity of 74% and 46%, respectively.
Conclusion:
Multislice spiral CTA with three-dimensional reconstruction was more accurate than MRA for both renal arterial and venous anatomy.
Related Concept Videos
Imaging Studies VII: Vascular Imaging
Imaging Studies IV: Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Imaging Studies III: Computed Tomography
Kidney Transplant I: Introduction
Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System V: CT
Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System IV: CMRI

