Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Common fragile sites.

Thomas W Glover1

  • 1Department of Human Genetics, 4909 Buhl, Box 0618, 1241 E. Catherine Street, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-0618, USA. glover@umich.edu

Cancer Letters
|October 19, 2005
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

High-fidelity rare structural variant detection with HiFiRE3 reduced representation via restriction enzyme ends.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same author

A CDK1 phospho-switch reprograms TRAIP to unload replisomes in mitosis.

Science (New York, N.Y.)·2026
Same author

Replication stress induces POLQ-mediated structural variant formation throughout common fragile sites after entry into mitosis.

Nature communications·2024
Same author

Applications of advanced technologies for detecting genomic structural variation.

Mutation research. Reviews in mutation research·2023
Same author

svCapture: efficient and specific detection of very low frequency structural variant junctions by error-minimized capture sequencing.

NAR genomics and bioinformatics·2023
Same author

Locus-specific transcription silencing at the FHIT gene suppresses replication stress-induced copy number variant formation and associated replication delay.

Nucleic acids research·2021

Common fragile sites are DNA regions prone to breakage, especially in cancer. Key cell cycle checkpoint genes are crucial for maintaining genome stability at these fragile sites.

Area of Science:

  • Genetics
  • Molecular Biology
  • Cancer Research

Background:

  • Common fragile sites (CFS) are specific chromosome regions susceptible to gaps and breaks under replication stress.
  • These sites are normally stable but become unstable with DNA replication inhibitors, leading to rearrangements.
  • CFS instability and associated gene alterations are frequently observed in various cancers, highlighting their role in genome instability.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review the current understanding of common fragile site instability.
  • To discuss the molecular mechanisms underlying fragile site instability.
  • To emphasize the significance of fragile sites in cancer and normal chromosome structure.

Main Methods:

  • Review of existing literature and research findings on common fragile sites.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Analysis of studies investigating the role of cell cycle checkpoint genes in fragile site stability.
  • Examination of the molecular characteristics of fragile sites, including replication timing and DNA flexibility.

    • Main Results:

    • Fragile sites are large genomic regions associated with genes, characterized by delayed replication and high DNA flexibility.
    • Key cell cycle checkpoint genes play a critical role in maintaining genome stability at common fragile sites.
    • Instability at fragile sites contributes to genome instability observed in cancer cells.

    Conclusions:

    • Understanding fragile site instability mechanisms is crucial for comprehending cancer development.
    • Further research is needed to fully elucidate why these sites are 'fragile' and their impact on associated genes in cancer.
    • Cell cycle checkpoints are vital for protecting fragile sites and preventing genomic instability.