Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 15, 2026

04:19
Minimally Invasive Treatment for Thoracolumbar Burst Fracture Using Sagittal Alignment Screws and A Trauma Reduction Device
Published on: November 8, 2024
Thoracic transfacet pedicle screw fixation: a new instrumentation technique
Atilla Akbay1, Serkan Inceoğlu, Ryan Milks
1Spine Research Laboratory, The Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio 44195, USA. atik@hacettepe.edu.tr
Journal of Neurosurgery. Spine
|October 21, 2005
Summary
Thoracic transfacet pedicle screw fixation (PSF) offers comparable biomechanical stability to standard PSF in short-term cyclic loading. This technique may serve as a viable alternative for select thoracic spine surgeries.
Area of Science:
- Orthopedic Surgery
- Spine Biomechanics
- Surgical Techniques
Background:
- Pedicle screw fixation (PSF) in the thoracic spine presents significant technical challenges.
- Alternative fixation methods like transverse process and costotransverse screw techniques exist.
- Thoracic transfacet PSF is a novel technique requiring biomechanical evaluation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To introduce and biomechanically evaluate thoracic transfacet pedicle screw fixation (PSF).
- To compare the short-term cyclic loading performance of transfacet PSF against standard PSF.
- To assess the biomechanical equivalence of these two thoracic spine fixation methods.
Main Methods:
- Cadaveric thoracic spine specimens were tested intact under cyclic loading (flexion, extension, lateral bending).
- Specimens were then instrumented with either standard PSF or transfacet PSF and retested.
- Load-to-failure testing in flexion was performed, with stiffness and failure loads analyzed.
Main Results:
- Both standard PSF and transfacet PSF constructs significantly increased construct stiffness compared to intact specimens.
- No statistically significant differences were found between standard PSF and transfacet PSF in stiffness or load-to-failure.
- The T7-T9 spinal region demonstrated lower biomechanical strength in flexion post-instrumentation.
Conclusions:
- Thoracic transfacet PSF demonstrates comparable short-term biomechanical performance to conventional PSF.
- Transfacet PSF may be a suitable alternative to standard PSF in specific thoracic surgical scenarios.
- Further long-term biomechanical data is warranted to fully establish transfacet PSF's role.
