Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Bone induction in craniofacial defects.

R P Nacamuli1, M T Longaker

  • 1Children's Surgical Research Program, Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, CA 94305, USA.

Orthodontics & Craniofacial Research
|October 22, 2005
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Musculoskeletal tissue engineering: Adipose derived stromal cell implementation for the treatment of osteoarthritis.

Biomaterials·2022
Same author

Dental, Oral, and Craniofacial Regenerative Medicine: Transforming Biotechnologies for Innovating Patient Care.

Journal of dental research·2018
Same author

Stem and progenitor cells: advancing bone tissue engineering.

Drug delivery and translational research·2015
Same author

Impact of surgical innovation on tissue repair in the surgical patient.

The British journal of surgery·2015
Same author

Biomaterials for craniofacial bone engineering.

Journal of dental research·2014
Same author

Primary cilia act as mechanosensors during bone healing around an implant.

Medical engineering & physics·2012
Same journal

Impact of Simulated Obesity in Animals on RANK/RANKL/OPG Pathway During Orthodontic Tooth Movement.

Orthodontics & craniofacial research·2026
Same journal

Methodological Design for Three-Dimensional Assessment of Maxillary and Mandibular Impacted Canines by Cone-Beam Computed Tomography: A Scoping Review.

Orthodontics & craniofacial research·2026
Same journal

Genetic and Environmental Influences on Dental Arch Shape During Development: A Longitudinal Twin Study.

Orthodontics & craniofacial research·2026
Same journal

Is Smartphone-Based 3D Photogrammetry Suitable for Indirect Facial Analysis in Patients With Dentofacial Deformities? A Trueness and Precision Analysis.

Orthodontics & craniofacial research·2026
Same journal

Minimally Invasive Surgical and Miniscrew-Assisted Rapid Palatal Expansion (MISMARPE) - Immediate Skeletal and Dentoalveolar Effects With Tooth-Bone-Borne Versus Bone-Borne Expanders: A Comparative Cohort Study.

Orthodontics & craniofacial research·2026
Same journal

Evaluation of Eruption Pattern of Second Permanent Molars Following Extraction of Compromised First Permanent Molars in Children and Its Predicting Factors: A Retrospective Radiographic Study.

Orthodontics & craniofacial research·2026
See all related articles

Reconstructing craniofacial bony defects remains challenging. This review explores current treatments and emerging tissue engineering strategies for improved craniofacial skeletal repair.

Area of Science:

  • Regenerative medicine
  • Craniofacial surgery
  • Biomaterials science

Background:

  • Craniofacial bony deficiencies present a chronic reconstructive problem, often resulting from trauma or disease treatment.
  • Current methods using alloplastic materials and autogenous bone grafts have limitations, lacking an ideal clinical solution.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review existing clinical approaches for treating craniofacial bony defects.
  • To discuss advancements in scaffolding materials and cell types for tissue-engineered craniofacial skeletal repair.

Main Methods:

  • Literature review of current craniofacial reconstruction techniques.
  • Exploration of novel biomaterials and cell-based therapies for tissue engineering.

Main Results:

Related Experiment Videos

  • Current reconstructive options for craniofacial defects are varied but not ideal.
  • Emerging research focuses on advanced scaffolding materials and suitable cell candidates for tissue engineering.

Conclusions:

  • Tissue engineering holds promise for developing improved solutions for craniofacial skeletal repair.
  • Further research into biomaterial design and cell integration is crucial for clinical translation.