Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Did Kettlewell commit fraud? Re-examining the evidence.

David Wyss Rudge

    Public Understanding of Science (Bristol, England)
    |October 26, 2005
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Tut-tut Tutt, not so fast. Did Kettlewell really test Tutt's explanation of industrial melanism?

    History and philosophy of the life sciences·2011
    Same author

    Cryptic designs on the peppered moth.

    Revista de biologia tropical·2002
    See all related articles

    This essay examines claims of scientific fraud against H.B.D. Kettlewell regarding his industrial melanism studies. It finds no evidence to support these allegations, questioning the portrayal of scientific history.

    Area of Science:

    • Evolutionary Biology
    • History of Science

    Background:

    • H.B.D. Kettlewell's research on industrial melanism is a cornerstone demonstration of natural selection.
    • Judith Hooper's 2002 book alleged scientific fraud by Kettlewell, citing discrepancies in his early findings.

    Discussion:

    • This essay critically analyzes Hooper's evidence, including her examination of Kettlewell's character, motives, and the feasibility of fraud.
    • The analysis scrutinizes Hooper's interpretation of Kettlewell's correspondence, scientific publications, and interviews with associates.

    Key Insights:

    • Hooper's allegations of scientific fraud against Kettlewell are found to be unsubstantiated upon critical examination.
    • The essay argues that Hooper's interpretation of the evidence does not withstand scrutiny.

    Related Experiment Videos

    Outlook:

    • The study concludes by discussing the implications for how the history of science is presented to the public.
    • It emphasizes the importance of rigorous analysis when re-evaluating historical scientific contributions.