Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

An empirical comparison of nine pattern classifiers.

Quoc-Long Tran, Kar-Ann Toh, Dipti Srinivasan

    IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics. Part B, Cybernetics : a Publication of the IEEE Systems, Man, and Cybernetics Society
    |October 26, 2005
    PubMed
    Summary

    This study compares a new learning algorithm, RM, and its extensions against classical classifiers. Results show RM

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Human Activity Recognition Through Augmented WiFi CSI Signals by Lightweight Attention-GRU.

    Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)·2025
    Same author

    Deep Learning Approach for the Localization and Analysis of Surface Plasmon Scattering.

    Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)·2023
    Same author

    Human Activity Recognition via Score Level Fusion of Wi-Fi CSI Signals.

    Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)·2023
    Same author

    Objective evaluation of deep uncertainty predictions for COVID-19 detection.

    Scientific reports·2022
    Same author

    Super-resolved Raman microscopy using random structured light illumination: Concept and feasibility.

    The Journal of chemical physics·2021
    Same author

    Machine learning-based leaky momentum prediction of plasmonic random nanosubstrate.

    Optics express·2021

    Area of Science:

    • Machine Learning
    • Pattern Classification
    • Data Mining

    Background:

    • Numerous learning algorithms exist for pattern classification, with ongoing research for improved performance.
    • New algorithms require empirical validation for accuracy and efficiency in real-world applications.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To empirically compare the performance of a recent learning algorithm, RM, and its extensions.
    • To evaluate RM against three classical classifiers based on accuracy, computational time, and storage.
    • To assess the impact of nominal attributes on classifier performance.

    Main Methods:

    • Standardized empirical comparison of RM, its extensions, and three classical classifiers.
    • Evaluation metrics included classification accuracy, computational time, and storage requirements.

    Related Experiment Videos

  • Experiments utilized datasets with varying characteristics, including nominal attributes.

    • Main Results:

    • The study provides a detailed empirical comparison of RM and its extensions against established classifiers.
    • Results offer insights into the practical performance of RM and its variants.
    • Nominal attributes were found to significantly influence the performance of the compared learning algorithms.

    Conclusions:

    • The empirical comparison offers valuable insights into the practical utility of the RM algorithm and its extensions.
    • The findings highlight the importance of considering attribute types, such as nominal attributes, in algorithm selection and performance.
    • This standardized comparison aids researchers and practitioners in understanding the strengths and weaknesses of different pattern classification algorithms.