Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 15, 2026

Interventional Diagnostic Procedure: A Practical Guide for the Assessment of Coronary Vascular Function
Published on: March 15, 2022
Is coronary angiography in unstable patients safe in district general hospitals without any on-site
P P Jokhi1, C Critoph, A Rozkovec
1Department of Cardiology, Royal Bournemouth Hospital, Castle Lane East, Bournemouth BH7 7DW, UK. pjokhi@dsl.pipex.com
Insights
Performing cardiac catheterisation locally in district general hospitals for high-risk unstable angina patients is safe and effective. This strategy avoids delays and saves hospital bed-days by identifying patients who do not require immediate revascularisation.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Interventional Cardiology
- Hospital Management
Background:
- Patients with unstable angina or non-ST segment elevation myocardial infarction face high risks of adverse events.
- Current guidelines advocate early interventional strategies, often involving pre-discharge coronary angiography.
- Traditional transfer of patients from district to tertiary centers causes significant delays due to bed scarcity.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess the safety and efficacy of performing diagnostic cardiac catheterisation in district general hospitals without on-site revascularisation.
- To evaluate if this strategy leads to earlier patient discharge and reduced hospital bed utilization.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective audit of 142 patients with non-ST elevation acute coronary syndrome (ACS) meeting high-risk criteria.
- Patients underwent inpatient coronary angiography at a district general hospital (DGH) over a 12-month period.
- Outcomes measured included complications from angiography and the number of bed-days saved through earlier discharge.
Main Results:
- 76% of patients had significant coronary disease; 49% were treated medically and discharged early without needing transfer.
- 32% required transfer for percutaneous intervention (PCI) and 19% for surgery, with a 43% overall revascularisation rate.
- Angiography was safe, with no deaths or myocardial infarctions; an estimated 490 bed-days were saved annually.
Conclusions:
- Diagnostic cardiac catheterisation is safe for most high-risk non-ST elevation ACS patients in DGHs lacking on-site revascularisation.
- This approach efficiently identifies patients needing onward referral, freeing up acute medical beds.
- Local angiography in DGHs facilitates earlier discharge for a significant proportion of patients.
Background:
Patients admitted to hospital with unstable angina or non-ST segment elevation myocardial infarction have a high risk of death, re-infarction or re-hospitalisation within the next 6 months. International guidelines recommend an early interventional strategy in moderate- to high-risk patients with pre-discharge coronary angiography. In the UK, such patients admitted to district hospitals have traditionally been transferred to tertiary centres for investigation and treatment. Due to the large numbers involved and scarcity of tertiary centre beds, this results in long delays before transfer. The objective of this study was to determine whether diagnostic cardiac catheterisation in moderate- to high-risk patients could be safely performed in hospitals without on-site revascularisation and whether this strategy led to earlier discharge times.
Methods:
A retrospective audit was undertaken of all patients undergoing inpatient coronary angiography to a large district general hospital (DGH) after admission with a clinical diagnosis of unstable angina or non-ST elevation myocardial infarction over a 12-month period from April 2002 to March 2003. The main outcome measures were complications arising from coronary angiography and number of bed-days saved by allowing earlier discharge.
Results:
142 patients with non-ST elevation ACS who met 'high risk' criteria underwent inpatient angiography locally. Significant luminal coronary disease was present in 76% of patients but 49% were treated medically and discharged early. 32% of patients required transfer for percutaneous intervention (PCI) and 19% were referred directly for surgery. There was a high revascularisation rate (43%) even in patients who did not have elevated troponin levels on admission. No patients died or sustained a myocardial infarction as a result of angiography, and morbidity was minimal. Patients waited an average of 3 days for an angiogram locally, but transfer time to a tertiary centre was 9 days for PCI and 12 days for surgery. As almost half of all patients were discharged without requiring transfer for revascularisation, we estimate a total of 490 bed-days were saved over 12 months.
Conclusion:
Cardiac catheterisation in most 'high-risk' patients with non-ST elevation ACS is safe in DGHs without on-site PCI or surgery and frees up large numbers of acute medical beds by selecting out only those patients requiring onward referral for revascularisation.
Related Concept Videos
Coronary Artery Disease V: Interprofessional Care
Acute Coronary Syndrome IV: Interprofessional Care
Angina II: Classification
Acute Coronary Syndrome III: Diagnostic Studies
Cardiac Catheterization I: Pre-Procedure Overview
Acute Coronary Syndrome I: Introduction
