Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Evaluation of body composition methods for accuracy.

John A Daniel1, Phil S Sizer, Neal S Latman

  • 1Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, School of Allied Health Sciences, Lubbock, TX, USA.

Biomedical Instrumentation & Technology
|October 27, 2005
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Upper limb neurodynamic mobilization disperses intraneural fluid in cervical nerve roots: A human cadaveric investigation.

Musculoskeletal science & practice·2023
Same author

A field study of the accuracy and reliability of a biometric iris recognition system.

Science & justice : journal of the Forensic Science Society·2013
Same author

The deep neck flexor endurance test: normative data scores in healthy adults.

PM & R : the journal of injury, function, and rehabilitation·2011
Same author

Inaccuracies introduced by single width blood pressure cuffs.

Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension·2010
Same author

Bioelectrical impedance analysis determination of water content and distribution in the horse.

Research in veterinary science·2010
Same author

Invited commentary.

The Journal of manual & manipulative therapy·2009

Portable body fat estimation methods show limited accuracy across diverse populations. Bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) was most accurate, while near-infrared was least accurate, suggesting caution when applying these tools broadly.

Area of Science:

  • Exercise Physiology
  • Human Body Composition Analysis
  • Biomedical Instrumentation

Background:

  • Accurate body composition assessment is crucial for health and performance.
  • Portable methods for estimating body fat percentage (%BF) are widely used but vary in accuracy.
  • A systematic evaluation of these methods against a gold standard is needed.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To systematically evaluate the accuracy of various portable methods for estimating body fat percentage (%BF).
  • To compare the performance of skinfold, girth, bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA), and near-infrared instruments against underwater weighing (UWW).

Main Methods:

  • 121 subjects (21-51 years, 105-226 lbs, 8.3-38.3% BF, 29% male) were assessed.
  • Body fat percentage (%BF) was estimated using four skinfold, three girth, two BIA, and one near-infrared method.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Estimates were compared to the reference standard of underwater weighing (UWW).

    • Main Results:

    • Correlation coefficients (r) between methods and UWW ranged from 0.48 to 0.72.
    • Most methods overestimated lower %BF and underestimated higher %BF.
    • Bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) instruments generally showed higher accuracy than near-infrared methods.
    • Accuracy varied between genders, with most methods being more accurate for males.

    Conclusions:

    • Most portable body fat estimation methods lack sufficient accuracy for a wide range of individuals.
    • While some methods may be accurate for specific populations, their generalizability is questionable.
    • Further research is needed to refine portable body composition assessment tools for broader application.