Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Adult age differences in distinctive processing: the modality effect on false recall.

Rebekah E Smith1, Jeffrey P Lozito, Ute J Bayen

  • 1Department of Psychology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA.

Psychology and Aging
|October 27, 2005
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Temporal dynamics: A systematic review and meta-analysis of time intervals in time-based prospective memory and their connection to time perception.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2026
Same author

Manipulating belief partially remedies the metamemory expectancy illusion in schema-based source monitoring.

Memory & cognition·2025
Same author

Relative source credibility affects the continued influence effect: Evidence of rationality in the CIE.

Cognition·2024
Same author

Modulating prospective memory and attentional control with high-definition transcranial current stimulation: Study protocol of a randomized, double-blind, and sham-controlled trial in healthy older adults.

PloS one·2023
Same author

Metacognitive differentiation of item memory and source memory in schema-based source monitoring.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2022
Same author

Remedying the Metamemory Expectancy Illusion in Source Monitoring: Are there Effects on Restudy Choices and Source Memory?

Metacognition and learning·2022

Older adults exhibit reduced distinctive memory processing. Unlike younger adults, older adults did not show fewer false memories when words were studied visually versus auditorily.

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Human Memory
  • Aging and Cognition

Background:

  • Distinctive processing enhances memory accuracy by emphasizing unique features of information.
  • Age-related cognitive changes can impact memory processes, including distinctive processing.
  • The Deese/Roediger and McDermott (DRM) paradigm is a standard tool for studying false memories.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate age differences in distinctive processing.
  • To examine how study presentation modality (visual vs. auditory) affects false recall in younger and older adults.
  • To determine if older adults show reduced distinctive processing compared to younger adults.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized the Deese/Roediger and McDermott (DRM) paradigm.
  • Participants studied word lists presented either visually or auditorily.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Measured false recall rates in younger and older adult groups.

    • Main Results:

    • Older adults did not exhibit the typical reduction in false recall observed with visual presentation compared to auditory presentation.
    • Younger adults typically show reduced false recall for visually presented words, indicating greater distinctive processing.
    • The pattern for older adults suggests a diminished effect of presentation modality on memory distinctiveness.

    Conclusions:

    • The findings suggest that older adults have reduced distinctive processing abilities.
    • Age-related declines in cognitive functions may underlie the observed differences in memory processing.
    • Presentation modality significantly influences memory distinctiveness, with a more pronounced effect in younger adults.