Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 15, 2026

Advancing Dyslexia Assessment in Children Through Computerized Testing
Published on: August 16, 2024
Comparing effect sizes in follow-up studies: ROC Area, Cohen's d, and r
Marnie E Rice1, Grant T Harris
1Mental Health Centre, Penetanguishene, Ontario, Canada. riceme@mcmaster.ca
Abstract:
In order to facilitate comparisons across follow-up studies that have used different measures of effect size, we provide a table of effect size equivalencies for the three most common measures: ROC area (AUC), Cohen's d, and r. We outline why AUC is the preferred measure of predictive or diagnostic accuracy in forensic psychology or psychiatry, and we urge researchers and practitioners to use numbers rather than verbal labels to characterize effect sizes.
Related Concept Videos
Receiver Operating Characteristic Plot
Odds Ratio
Comparing Experimental Results: Student's t-Test
One-Way ANOVA: Equal Sample Sizes
Different sample means can result in different values for the variance estimate: variance between samples. This is because the variance between samples is calculated as the product of the sample size and the variance between the...
Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups
Identifying Statistically Significant Differences: The F-Test