Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Practice effects, workload, and reaction time in deception.

Jennifer M C Vendemia1, Robert F Buzan, Eric P Green

  • 1University of South Carolina, Department of Psychology, Columbia 29209, USA. Vendemia@sc.edu

The American Journal of Psychology
|November 1, 2005
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

White matter microstructure of sensorimotor projection fibers in chronic low back pain.

Pain reports·2026
Same author

Cerebellar gray matter alterations in chronic low back pain and their associations with postural control and pain sensitivity.

Pain·2026
Same author

Sleep architecture and quality and pain experience in individuals with persistent low back pain and asymptomatic controls.

PloS one·2025
Same author

The Effects of Experimental Sleep Extension in Middle-to-Older-Aged Healthy Sleepers.

Sleep science (Sao Paulo, Brazil)·2024
Same author

Data-Driven Cutoff Selection for the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 Depression Screening Tool.

JAMA network open·2024
Same author

Association between seated trunk control and cortical sensorimotor white matter brain changes in patients with chronic low back pain.

PloS one·2024
Same journal

Attributing social meaning to animated shapes: A new experimental study of apparent behavior.

The American journal of psychology·2021
Same journal

Scientific Study of Magic: Binet's Pioneering Approach Based on Observations and Chronophotography.

The American journal of psychology·2018
Same journal

Child and Ancient Man: How to Define Their Commonalities and Differences.

The American journal of psychology·2018
Same journal

Adolescent Aggression as Predicted from Parent-Child Relationships and Executive Functions.

The American journal of psychology·2018
Same journal

The Effect of Collective Transitions on the Organization and Contents of Autobiographical Memory: A Transition Theory Perspective.

The American journal of psychology·2018
Same journal

The Development and Validity of a Chinese Version of the Compound Remote Associates Test.

The American journal of psychology·2018
See all related articles

Deceptive responses consistently take longer than truthful ones, regardless of practice. This study supports a cognitive model explaining deception through reaction time differences.

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Neuroscience
  • Human Behavior

Background:

  • Deception research involves cognitive and psychophysiological perspectives.
  • Cognitive theories focus on attention, memory, and incongruity.
  • Psychophysiological theories emphasize arousal, emotion, and stimulus salience.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To present a comprehensive cognitive model of deception.
  • To investigate the impact of practice on deceptive responding.
  • To analyze reaction time (RT) in truthful versus deceptive responses.

Main Methods:

  • A three-session longitudinal study design.
  • Participants evaluated self-referent sentences.
  • Truthful and deceptive response conditions were implemented.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Deceptive responding yielded significantly longer RTs compared to truthful responding.
  • The difference in RT between deceptive and truthful responses remained stable with practice.
  • Practice did not reduce the RT cost associated with deception.

Conclusions:

  • Findings support a cognitive model of deception.
  • Reaction time serves as a reliable indicator of deception.
  • The cognitive load associated with deception is persistent despite practice.