Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Confidence interval construction for proportion difference in small-sample paired studies.

Man-Lai Tang1, Nian-Sheng Tang, Ivan S F Chan

  • 1Department of Mathematics, Hong Kong Baptist University, Kowloon Tong, Hong Kong.

Statistics in Medicine
|November 2, 2005
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Spatially Correlated Analysis of Infectious Disease Outcomes Based on Bayesian Functional Hierarchical Models.

Statistics in medicine·2026
Same author

An enhanced exact permutation rank-based inferential seamless phase 2/3 design.

Journal of biopharmaceutical statistics·2026
Same author

Functional varying-coefficient Cox model and its application.

Statistical methods in medical research·2026
Same author

The Improved EMS Algorithm for Latent Variable Selection in M3PL Model.

Applied psychological measurement·2024
Same author

Bayesian analysis of joint quantile regression for multi-response longitudinal data with application to primary biliary cirrhosis sequential cohort study.

Statistical methods in medical research·2024
Same author

Sample size determination for interval estimation of the prevalence of a sensitive attribute under non-randomized response models.

The British journal of mathematical and statistical psychology·2024
Same journal

Latent Class Log-Linear Models for Estimating Diagnostic Test Accuracy Without a Gold Standard: A Simulation Study.

Statistics in medicine·2026
Same journal

Interpretable Bayesian Modeling for Multireader Multicase Studies: Addressing Overdispersion and Limited Sample Size in Diagnostic Enhancement Evaluation.

Statistics in medicine·2026
Same journal

Adaptive Sequential Multiple Hypotheses Testing for Concomitant Vaccine Safety Surveillance.

Statistics in medicine·2026
Same journal

Novel Distance Regression for Repeated Outcomes With Missing Data: Applications to Longitudinal and Crossover Studies of Microbiome Beta-Diversity.

Statistics in medicine·2026
Same journal

Optimal Weighted Tests for Replication Studies and the 'Two-Trials Rule' With Multiple Hypotheses.

Statistics in medicine·2026
Same journal

Identifiable Copula-Double-Cox Models: A Fully Parametric Framework for Dependent Right-Censored Survival Data.

Statistics in medicine·2026
See all related articles

This study evaluates confidence intervals for paired dichotomous data in small clinical trials. Approximate unconditional score confidence intervals offer good coverage and are computationally efficient for rate difference estimation.

Area of Science:

  • Biostatistics
  • Clinical Trials
  • Statistical Methods

Background:

  • Paired dichotomous data are common in clinical trials, necessitating accurate parameter estimation.
  • Existing asymptotic confidence intervals may perform poorly with small sample sizes.
  • Reliable confidence intervals are crucial for reporting findings in medical journals.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate alternative confidence interval estimators for the difference between binomial proportions using small-sample paired data.
  • To compare the performance of exact and approximate unconditional confidence intervals.
  • To identify computationally feasible methods with good coverage properties.

Main Methods:

  • Inverting a score test to derive exact and approximate unconditional confidence intervals for rate difference.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Evaluating coverage properties of different confidence interval estimators through empirical results.
  • Utilizing real-world examples from pain management and cancer studies for illustration.

    • Main Results:

    • Exact unconditional confidence intervals provide guaranteed coverage but can be conservative and computationally intensive.
    • Approximate unconditional score confidence intervals demonstrate good coverage in small samples.
    • Approximate methods are computationally less demanding and easier to implement.

    Conclusions:

    • Approximate unconditional score confidence intervals are recommended for small-sample paired dichotomous data due to their balance of coverage accuracy and computational efficiency.
    • These methods offer a practical alternative to exact intervals when strict coverage control is not paramount.
    • The findings aid researchers in selecting appropriate statistical tools for analyzing paired binary outcomes in clinical research.