Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Modeling behavior in a clinically diagnostic sequential risk-taking task.

Thomas S Wallsten1, Timothy J Pleskac, C W Lejuez

  • 1Department of Psychology, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742, USA. twallsten@psyc.umd.edu

Psychological Review
|November 3, 2005
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The cognitive mechanisms behind wishful predictions: A diffusion model decomposition.

Cognition·2025
Same author

Modeling police officers' deadly force decisions in an immersive shooting simulator.

Journal of experimental psychology. Applied·2025
Same author

Cognitive Mechanisms of Aberrant Self-Referential Social Perception in Psychosis and Bipolar Disorder: Insights From Computational Modeling.

Schizophrenia bulletin·2024
Same author

Cognitive Mechanisms of Aberrant Self-Referential Social Perception in Psychosis and Bipolar Disorder: Insights from Computational Modeling.

medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences·2024
Same author

A Cognitive Computational Approach to Social and Collective Decision-Making.

Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science·2023
Same author

Mathematical modeling of risk-taking in bipolar disorder: Evidence of reduced behavioral consistency, with altered loss aversion specific to those with history of substance use disorder.

Computational psychiatry (Cambridge, Mass.)·2023
Same journal

Perception and action as one: Re-integrating research on human action through event files.

Psychological review·2026
Same journal

Associative learning explains "intuitive statistics" in animals.

Psychological review·2026
Same journal

A reciprocal model of practice and skill: Navigating between dropout and expertise.

Psychological review·2026
Same journal

The relative psychometric function: A general analysis framework for relating psychological processes.

Psychological review·2026
Same journal

A taxonomy of discriminatory behavior.

Psychological review·2026
Same journal

Extreme-value signal detection theory for recognition memory: The parametric road not taken.

Psychological review·2026
See all related articles

This study models cognitive processes in risk-taking tasks, finding that subjective value of gains correlates with real-world risk behavior. The results offer insights into risky choice theories and public health approaches to risk-taking.

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Decision Science
  • Behavioral Economics

Background:

  • Understanding cognitive processes in risk-taking is crucial for behavioral economics and public health.
  • Sequential choice tasks in moderately complex environments offer insights into decision-making under uncertainty.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To model cognitive processes in learning and sequential choice within a risk-taking task.
  • To investigate the relationship between behavior in a risk-taking task and self-reported real-world risk-taking.
  • To inform theories of risky choice and public health strategies for risk management.

Main Methods:

  • Developed a stochastic model to simulate cognitive processes during a risk-taking task.
  • Assessed how participants update outcome probabilities and evaluate choice policies.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Correlated model parameters with self-reported external risk-taking behaviors.

    • Main Results:

    • The optimal model indicated participants treated probabilities as stationary, used Bayesian updating, evaluated choices pre-response, and maintained constant sensitivity.
    • A significant correlation was found between the model parameter for subjective value of gains and external risk-taking.
    • The findings provide a quantitative understanding of cognitive mechanisms in risky decision-making.

    Conclusions:

    • The cognitive model offers a framework for understanding individual differences in risk-taking behavior.
    • Results support the integration of cognitive modeling into theories of risky choice.
    • The study highlights the potential of risk-task modeling for public health interventions aimed at mitigating risks.