Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 15, 2026
Prehospital Thrombolysis: A Manual from Berlin
Published on: November 26, 2013
Validation of low-acuity emergency medical services dispatch codes
Glen E Michael1, Karl A Sporer
1Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA.
Background:
Computer-aided dispatch systems are used to assess the severity of a 9-1-1 caller's complaint and then assign an appropriate level of emergency medical services (EMS) response.
Objective:
To evaluate a group of low-acuity codes (defined as requiring advanced life support [ALS] intervention in fewer than 10% of cases) that has been derived and validated in one community.
Methods:
All of the 9-1-1 medical calls assigned to these predetermined emergency medical dispatch codes between January 1, 2004, and July 1, 2004, were analyzed. ALS care was defined as receiving one or more of the following: pulse oximetry measurement, blood glucose measurement, cardiac defibrillation, administration of any medication, airway maneuvers, or the placement of an intravenous (IV) catheter. A more restrictive definition of ALS care (use of IV fluid bolus, medication administration, intubation, or defibrillation) was also calculated.
Results:
A total of 1,799 calls were assigned low-acuity dispatch codes, and 1,597 met inclusion criteria. None of the 26 dispatch codes were found to be low-acuity by the study definition. Fifty-six percent of these patients received ALS care. Placement of an IV-catheter was the ALS intervention used most frequently (45% of cases), followed by pulse oximetry measurement (32%), glucose measurement (22%), medication administration (11%), intubation (0.13%), and defibrillation (0%). The medication administered most frequent was morphine. When using the more restrictive definition of acuity, patients in 19 of the 28 categories received ALS intervention less than 10% of the time. Patients in the other seven categories were considered high-acuity 13% to 36% of the time.
Conclusion:
Dispatch codes that had previously been determined to be low-acuity were found not to be so in this community. The variation in clinical practice is likely explained by a more precautionary approach to care in this EMS system and the increased use of analgesics. This study demonstrates the need to define the optimal subset of prehospital patients who would benefit from these treatments.
Related Concept Videos
01:26Types of Reports III: Telephone and Verbal Reports
Here's an overview of each type:
Telephone Orders
01:26Guidelines for Nursing Documentation II
Timely documentation is crucial to ensure continuity of care for patients. Any delays in recording or reporting medical information can result in medical errors and even adverse patient outcomes. From medication administration to diagnostic test results, every detail must be accurately and promptly documented to provide the best possible care for patients.
01:22Standards of Care I
01:30Guidelines for Nursing Documentation I
Factual:
The following points emphasize the significance of upholding accurate and unbiased documentation in healthcare.
01:23Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation III: AED Use
01:14SBAR II: Application of SBAR
SBAR Report from a Nurse to a Health Care Provider
S: "Hello, Dr. Smith. This is Jane, RN, from the Med Surg unit. I am calling to tell you about Ms. White in Room 210, who is experiencing increased pain and redness at her incision site. Her recent...