Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 15, 2026

Testing Tactile Masking between the Forearms
Published on: February 10, 2016
Informational masking for simultaneous nonspeech stimuli: psychometric functions for fixed and randomly mixed maskers
Nathaniel I Durlach1, Christine R Mason, Frederick J Gallun
1Hearing Research Center Boston University, 635 Commonwealth Avenue, Boston, Massachusetts 02215, USA. durlach@mit.edu
Abstract:
Sensitivity d' and response bias beta were measured as a function of target level for the detection of a 1000-Hz tone in multitone maskers using a one interval, two-alternative forced-choice (1I-2AFC) paradigm. Ten such maskers, each with eight randomly selected components in the region 200-5000 Hz, with 800-1250 Hz excluded to form a protected zone, were presented under two conditions: the fixed condition, in which the same eight-component masker is used throughout an experimental run, and the random condition, in which an eight-component masker is chosen randomly trial-to-trial from the given set of ten such maskers. Differences between the results obtained with these two conditions help characterize the listener's susceptibility to informational masking (IM). The d' results show great intersubject variability, but can be reasonably well fit by simple energy-detector models in which internal noise and filter bandwidth are used as fitting parameters. In contrast, the beta results are not well fit by these models. In addition to presentation of new data and its relation to energy-detector models, this paper provides comments on a variety of issues, problems, and research needs in the IM area.

