Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Bone-conducted sound: physiological and clinical aspects.

Stefan Stenfelt1, Richard L Goode

  • 1Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, California 94305-5739, USA.

Otology & Neurotology : Official Publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [And] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology
|November 8, 2005
PubMed
Summary

Bone conduction hearing, a century-old phenomenon, is not fully understood. Research identifies five factors, with cochlear fluid inertia being key, impacting hearing aid use for certain hearing losses.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Effects of fundamental-frequency separation and spatial configuration on speech intelligibility in the mid-sagittal plane under bone-conduction stimulation.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2026
Same author

Comparisons of air and bone conduction transfer properties utilizing stimulus frequency otoacoustic emissions.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2026
Same author

Impact of age and sensorineural hearing loss on sound transmission to the inner ear based on analysis of air-bone gaps.

Hearing research·2025
Same author

Externalization of Virtual Sound Sources With Bone and Air Conduction Stimulation.

Trends in hearing·2025
Same author

Effects of mild-to-moderate sensorineural hearing loss and signal amplification on vocal emotion recognition in middle-aged-older individuals.

PloS one·2025
Same author

Mechanical impedance of the skin-covered human head at different stimulation positions, static forces, and interface areas.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2025

Area of Science:

  • Audiology
  • Otoacoustic Emissions
  • Auditory Physiology

Background:

  • Bone conduction hearing, the sensation of sound via skull vibration, has been recognized since the 19th century.
  • Despite extensive research, the precise physiology of bone conduction hearing remains incompletely understood.
  • Recent advancements offer new insights into this auditory pathway.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review the current understanding of bone conduction hearing physiology.
  • To discuss the clinical relevance and limitations of bone conduction sound.
  • To provide clinicians with essential knowledge for managing hearing loss.

Main Methods:

  • Literature review encompassing clinical bone conduction hearing.
  • Inclusion of studies on bone conduction hearing aids.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Incorporation of basic research and recent laboratory findings on bone conduction physiology.
  • Main Results:

    • Five contributing factors to bone conduction hearing were identified: external ear canal sound radiation, middle ear ossicle inertia, cochlear fluid inertia, cochlear wall compression, and cerebrospinal fluid pressure transmission.
    • Inertia of the cochlear fluid emerged as the most significant factor.
    • Bone conduction sensitivity is less affected by middle ear diseases than air conduction sensitivity.

    Conclusions:

    • Bone conduction hearing is influenced by multiple physical factors, with cochlear fluid inertia playing a primary role.
    • Bone conduction is considered a reliable indicator of cochlear function, though influenced by specific conditions.
    • Bone conduction hearing aids are valuable for patients with hearing loss contraindicating air conduction aids, despite the former's lower efficiency.