Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Contextual effects in fine spatial discriminations.

Lynn A Olzak1, Pentti I Laurinen

  • 1Department of Psychology, Miami University of Ohio, Oxford 45056, USA. olzakla@muohio.edu

Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, Image Science, and Vision
|November 10, 2005
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The extraction of natural scene gist in visual crowding.

Scientific reports·2018
Same author

No masking between test and mask components in perceptually different depth planes.

Perception·2012
Same author

Contour integration across spatial frequency.

Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance·2009
Same author

Low-level features determine brightness in White's and Benary's illusions.

Vision research·2009
Same author

Brightness processing in the visual cortex.

Neuroscience letters·2007
Same author

Spatial frequency difference between textures interferes with brightness perception.

Vision research·2007
Same journal

Multi-module collaborative optimization-driven fast speckle correlation imaging in variable environments.

Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision·2026
Same journal

Secrecy performance analysis of NOMA-UWOC systems over a vertically stratified WGG oceanic turbulence channel.

Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision·2026
Same journal

Backscattering of plane waves in a composite system containing a rough surface and anisotropic scatterers.

Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision·2026
Same journal

Aspherical surface construction methods based on extended Jacobi polynomials.

Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision·2026
Same journal

OCT sidelobe suppression method based on dual-path phase sinusoidal modulation and minimum value fusion.

Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision·2026
Same journal

Optical design concepts using wavelength-selective diffractive optics to enable miniaturized multimodal endoscopic imaging across separated spectral ranges.

Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision·2026
See all related articles

Surround contrast influences visual perception. Unexpected performance dips occurred when center and surround patterns were in phase and similar, suggesting scene segregation impacts contrast discrimination.

Area of Science:

  • Visual perception
  • Computational neuroscience
  • Psychophysics

Background:

  • Visual context significantly alters perceived contrast, often explained by pooled contrast gain control.
  • Higher surround contrast typically reduces apparent contrast.
  • The impact of patterned surrounds on fine visual discriminations remains less understood.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate how patterned surrounds affect orientation, contrast, and spatial frequency discriminations.
  • To determine the influence of surround contrast and phase on these discrimination abilities.

Main Methods:

  • Participants performed suprathreshold orientation, contrast, and spatial frequency discriminations.
  • Stimuli included a central pattern surrounded by a patterned annulus.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Surround contrast and phase were systematically varied.

    • Main Results:

    • Discrimination performance generally decreased with increasing surround contrast.
    • An unexpected dip in performance was observed when the center and surround were in phase and had similar contrast.
    • This dip suggests context effects extend beyond simple gain control.

    Conclusions:

    • Contextual modulation of visual discrimination is complex.
    • Scene segregation mechanisms may contribute to the observed performance dips.
    • These findings offer new insights into how the visual system processes contextual information.