Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Mortgaging the future: dumping ethics with nuclear waste.

Kristin Shrader-Frechette1

  • 1Department of Philosophy, 100 Malloy Hall, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, IN 46556, USA. Kristin.Shrader-Frechette@nd.edu

Science and Engineering Ethics
|November 11, 2005
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Reducing income inequality to reduce health inequities: response to "Applying mixtures methodology to analyze how exposure to structural racism and economic disadvantage affect perinatal health outcomes: an ECHO study".

American journal of epidemiology·2026
Same author

Addressing systemic problems with exposure assessments to protect the public's health.

Environmental health : a global access science source·2023
Same author

A science-based agenda for health-protective chemical assessments and decisions: overview and consensus statement.

Environmental health : a global access science source·2023
Same author

Does Hazardous-Waste Testing Follow Technical Guidance, Thus Help Protect Environmental Justice and Health?

International journal of environmental research and public health·2022
Same author

Correction: Shrader-Frechette, K.; Biondo, A.M. Data-Quality Assessment Signals Toxic-Site Safety Threats and Environmental Injustices. <i>Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health</i> 2021, <i>18</i>, 2012.

International journal of environmental research and public health·2021
Same author

Correction: Shrader-Frechette, K.; Biondo, A.M. Health Misinformation about Toxic-Site Harm: The Case for Independent-Party Testing to Confirm Safety. <i>Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health</i> 2021, <i>18</i>, 3882.

International journal of environmental research and public health·2021

The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) proposed nuclear waste regulations for Yucca Mountain may threaten public health. Changes in radiation exposure limits and compliance methods could lead to unequal protection and fatal exposures.

Area of Science:

  • Environmental Science
  • Public Health
  • Nuclear Safety

Background:

  • The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) proposed new regulations for radiation releases from the Yucca Mountain nuclear waste repository in 2005.
  • The goal was to ensure public health protection for one million years, despite anticipated radioactive waste leakage.
  • Existing regulations aimed for equal protection against all radiation exposures exceeding the legal limit.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To critically evaluate proposed changes to radiation exposure limits and compliance assessment methods for the Yucca Mountain repository.
  • To identify potential negative consequences of these regulatory shifts on public health and safety.

Main Methods:

  • Analysis of the EPA's proposed regulations concerning radiation exposure limits for different time periods.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Examination of the proposed shift from using arithmetic mean to median dose for assessing regulatory compliance.
  • Critique of the scientific validity and ethical implications of the proposed changes.

    • Main Results:

    • The proposed changes introduce different radiation exposure limits for distinct timeframes.
    • The EPA recommended using the arithmetic mean for compliance in one period and the median dose in another.
    • These alterations could undermine equal protection, disregard vulnerable populations, permit fatal exposures, and employ flawed dose calculations.

    Conclusions:

    • The proposed EPA regulations for Yucca Mountain raise significant concerns regarding public health and safety.
    • The changes in exposure limits and compliance methods may compromise the principle of equal protection.
    • Scientific flaws in dose calculations and potential for fatal exposures necessitate a re-evaluation of the proposed standards.