Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 12, 2026

Visualization of Intensity Levels to Reduce the Gap Between Self-Reported and Directly Measured Physical Activity
Published on: March 7, 2019
Handling missing data in self-report measures
Susan M Fox-Wasylyshyn1, Maher M El-Masri
1University of Windsor, Faculty of Nursing, 401 Sunset, Health Education Centre, Room 322, Windsor, Ontario, Canada N9B3P4.
Abstract:
Self-report measures are extensively used in nursing research. Data derived from such reports can be compromised by the problem of missing data. To help ensure accurate parameter estimates and valid research results, the problem of missing data needs to be appropriately addressed. However, a review of nursing research literature revealed that issues such as the extent and pattern of missingness, and the approach used to handle missing data are seldom reported. The purpose of this article is to provide researchers with a conceptual overview of the issues associated with missing data, procedures used in determining the pattern of missingness, and techniques for handling missing data. The article also highlights the advantages and disadvantages of these techniques, and makes distinctions between data that are missing at the item versus variable levels. Missing data handling techniques addressed in this article include deletion approaches, mean substitution, regression-based imputation, hot-deck imputation, multiple imputation, and maximum likelihood imputation.
Related Concept Videos
Self-Discrepancy Theory
Self-Presentation: Self-Monitoring and Self-Handicapping
Trimmed Mean
Although certain measures of central tendency are not sensitive to outliers, there are alternative versions of the mean that get around the...
Data Reporting and Recording
Self-Report Tests of Personality
Self-Discrepancy and Its Effects