Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Why carve up your continuous data?

Steven V Owen1, Robin D Froman

  • 1Department of Pediatrics, School of Medicine, and Center for Epidemiology & Biostatistics, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, USA.

Research in Nursing & Health
|November 16, 2005
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Evaluation of an Evidence-Based Practice Tutorial for Nurses: A Useful Tool and Some Lessons Learned.

Journal of continuing education in nursing·2016
Same author

The ins and outs of self-report response options and scales.

Research in nursing & health·2014
Same author

Why you want to avoid being a causist.

Research in nursing & health·2014
Same author

Self-regulation strategies of children with emotional disturbance.

Physical & occupational therapy in pediatrics·2008
Same author

Polishing your shot at the bull's eye: the "Please Do" list.

Research in nursing & health·2008
Same author

Concern about petrochemical health risk before and after a refinery explosion.

Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis·2008
Same journal

Missed Nursing Care in Neonatal Intensive Care Units for Infants Experiencing or at Risk of Experiencing Substance Withdrawal.

Research in nursing & health·2026
Same journal

The Impact of Stress, Trauma, and Violence on Well-Being and Physical Health.

Research in nursing & health·2026
Same journal

A Comparison of Post-Traumatic Stress and Depressive Symptoms by Suicidal Ideation Among Black Transgender Women.

Research in nursing & health·2026
Same journal

Exploring Prolonged Grief Experiences of Ethnoracial Minoritized Caregivers: An Emic Perspective.

Research in nursing & health·2026
Same journal

The Psychometric Properties of the Caregiver Feeding Style Questionnaire: A Cross-Cultural Validation in Spanish Parents.

Research in nursing & health·2026
Same journal

Feasibility of an Online Resilience Program for Mothers With Adverse Childhood Experiences.

Research in nursing & health·2026
See all related articles

Researchers often unnecessarily categorize continuous data, leading to flawed statistical power and errors. This study highlights the risks of data carving and offers better alternatives for social, biophysical, and health research.

Area of Science:

  • Social Sciences
  • Biophysics
  • Health Research

Background:

  • Continuous data are frequently used in social, biophysical, and health research.
  • Researchers sometimes divide continuous data into ordered categories, a practice known as data carving.
  • This categorization can lead to significant information loss and statistical inaccuracies.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To examine the impact of data carving on statistical results.
  • To identify instances of data carving in nursing literature.
  • To propose alternative methods to data categorization.

Main Methods:

  • Analysis of selected nursing research articles to identify data carving practices.
  • Illustrative examples demonstrating how categorization affects statistical outcomes.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Development of alternative data analysis strategies.

    • Main Results:

    • Data carving was found in selected nursing literature.
    • Unnecessary categorization can lead to reduced or inflated statistical power.
    • Erroneous statistical results, including Type I and Type II errors, can arise from data carving.

    Conclusions:

    • Data carving is a problematic practice that distorts research findings.
    • Researchers should avoid unnecessary categorization of continuous data.
    • Alternative analytical approaches offer more accurate and reliable results.