Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 14, 2026

A New Single Chamber Implantable Defibrillator with Atrial Sensing: A Practical Demonstration of Sensing and Ease of Implantation
Published on: February 28, 2012
Indications for internal cardioverter defibrillator implantation predict time to first shock and the modulating
Haitham Hreybe1, Maninder Bedi, Rana Ezzeddine
1University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA.
Insights
Implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) shock risk varies by indication. Secondary prevention patients face higher shocks, but beta-blockers improve shock-free survival.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Electrophysiology
- Medical Devices
Background:
- Implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) are used for various cardiac conditions.
- The influence of specific ICD indications on shock timing is unclear.
- The role of beta-blockers in modifying shock-free survival needs further clarification.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate how different indications for ICD implantation affect the time to the first shock.
- To evaluate the impact of beta-blocker therapy on shock-free survival in ICD patients.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective analysis of 230 patients undergoing ICD implantation.
- Patients categorized into four groups based on ICD indication (secondary prevention, LVEF criteria).
- Kaplan-Meier method used to analyze time to first shock, with subgroup analysis for beta-blocker use.
Main Results:
- Overall 1-year shock-free survival varied significantly by indication (57% to 91%).
- Patients with secondary prevention indications had lower shock-free survival (57% total, 75% appropriate shocks).
- Beta-blocker use in secondary prevention patients increased 1-year shock-free survival (48% to 61% total shocks).
Conclusions:
- ICD implantation indication, not electrophysiology study results, predicts time to first shock.
- Patients receiving ICDs for secondary prevention are at the highest risk of shocks.
- Beta-blockers demonstrably increase time to first shock in patients with secondary prevention indications.
Background:
Patients receive implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) for varying indications. Whether these indications influence the time to first ICD shock is suspected but not confirmed. The modulating effect of beta-blockers on shock-free survival is not fully elucidated.
Method:
A retrospective analysis of 230 consecutive patients (age 63 +/- 14 years, 79% men, 75% ischemic, 70% beta-blockers) implanted with an ICD was performed. Patients were divided into 4 groups depending on the ICD indication: groups A (secondary prevention of sudden death), B (left ventricular ejection fraction < or = 35% and positive electrophysiology study [EPS]), C (left ventricular ejection fraction < or = 35% and negative EPS or no EPS performed), and D (patients who did not meet inclusion criteria for groups A, B, or C). Time to shock was analyzed by the Kaplan-Meier method.
Results:
During a mean follow-up of 489 +/- 280 days, 57 (24.7%) patients received 82 shocks (49% appropriate). The 1-year shock-free survival for patients in groups A, B, C, and D were 57%, 77%, 79%, and 91%, respectively (P = .03), for total shocks and 75%, 92%, 92%, and 100%, respectively (P = .007), for appropriate shocks. For patients in group A, the use of beta-blockers increased the 1-year shock-free survival from 48% to 61% for total shocks and from 65% to 79% for appropriate shocks.
Conclusion:
Time to first shock is determined by the indication for ICD implantation and is not predicted by the results of EPS. Patients with secondary indications for ICD implantation are at highest risk of shocks and may deserve consideration for prophylactic antiarrhythmic drugs. beta-Blockers increase the time to first ICD shock in patients implanted for secondary prevention of sudden death.
Related Concept Videos
Dysrhythmias VI: Management of Dysrhythmias
ECG Interpretation of Arrhythmias II: Atrial, Junctional and Ventricular Arrhythmias
Disturbances in Heart Rhythm
Arrhythmias are categorized by their speed, rhythm, and origin. A slow heart...
Cardiomyopathy V: Interprofessional Care
Antiarrhythmic Drugs: Class II Agents as β-Adrenergic Blockers
Antiarrhythmic Drugs: Class I Agents as Sodium Channel Blockers
Class 1A Antiarrhythmic Drugs: These drugs work by moderately blocking sodium channels,...
