Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Adaptation and generalization in acceleration-dependent force fields.

Eun Jung Hwang1, Maurice A Smith, Reza Shadmehr

  • 1Laboratory for Computational Motor Control, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, 416 Traylor Building, 720 Rutland Ave, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA.

Experimental Brain Research
|November 18, 2005
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

A noradrenergic I <sub>h</sub> -dependent pacemaker system drives sniffing.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same author

Feasibility and validity of the D-Cog: A novel digital spatial working memory test for dementia assessment.

Journal of Alzheimer's disease : JAD·2026
Same author

Efficacy and Safety of Topical Anticholinergics in the Treatment of Primary Axillary Hyperhidrosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Clinical drug investigation·2026
Same author

Consensus Paper: Models of Cerebellar Functions.

Cerebellum (London, England)·2026
Same author

Coordination of spike timing among the neurons of the cerebellum.

Research square·2026
Same author

A neural language for the cerebellum: control of behavior via competing populations of Purkinje cells.

Journal of neurophysiology·2026
Same journal

Changes in synergy formation and modulation during cyclic finger force production tasks in female adults with dystonic cerebral palsy.

Experimental brain research·2026
Same journal

Molecular links between reelin downregulation, topoisomerase IIβ alterations, and proteins involved in Alzheimer pathology in human SH-SY5Y neuroblastoma cell line.

Experimental brain research·2026
Same journal

Motor cortex excitability during spine shape-judgment in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a TMS motor evoked potential study.

Experimental brain research·2026
Same journal

Trajectory dynamics and endpoint accuracy in targeted ballistic contractions.

Experimental brain research·2026
Same journal

Exploring Sevoflurane promotes hippocampal neuron mitophagy in elderly postoperative cognitive dysfunction by HSP90AA1 based on network pharmacology.

Experimental brain research·2026
Same journal

Loading modulates monosynaptic transmission from spindle primary afferents to motoneurons in humans.

Experimental brain research·2026
See all related articles

The human brain

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Biomechanics
  • Motor Control

Background:

  • Objects held in hand create forces dependent on limb state (position, velocity, acceleration).
  • Optimal control systems require linearly separable velocity and acceleration representations.
  • Mammalian proprioception (e.g., muscle spindles) nonlinearly encodes limb state, prioritizing velocity over acceleration.

Purpose of the Study:

  • Investigate whether the brain uses optimal control representations or proprioception-based representations for internal models of limb dynamics.
  • Determine how humans generalize reaching movements in acceleration-dependent force fields.

Main Methods:

  • Human participants performed reaching movements in externally applied, acceleration-dependent force fields.
  • Analyzed generalization patterns to infer the structure of internal models.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Compared human generalization to predictions from optimal control models and proprioception-based models.

    • Main Results:

    • Human generalization patterns were inconsistent with optimal control models that independently represent velocity and acceleration.
    • Learned internal models were rooted in proprioceptive properties, showing nonlinear responses to muscle activation.
    • Internal models represented velocity more strongly than acceleration, mirroring proprioceptive sensor characteristics.

    Conclusions:

    • The brain's internal models of limb dynamics are closely tied to peripheral proprioceptive sensor properties, not optimal control principles.
    • Proprioception's nonlinear encoding influences how the brain represents and controls limb movement dynamics.
    • This suggests a biological constraint or adaptation in motor learning and control, prioritizing sensory encoding over abstract dynamic separability.