Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Evaluation of platelet function, a method comparison.

S Nylander1, K Johansson, J J J Van Giezen

  • 1Department of Molecular Pharmacology, Preclinical R&D, AstraZeneca R&D, Mölndal, Sweden. sven.nylander@astrazeneca.com

Platelets
|November 26, 2005
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Head and neck lymphedema after radiotherapy - Prevalence, changes and associated factors - a prospective observational cohort study.

Oral oncology·2025
Same author

Feasibility and Potential Benefits of Moderate Intensity Cycling in People Living with Lower Limb Lymphedema: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial.

Lymphology·2025
Same author

The value of CSF diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers in NMOSD and MOGAD in real-life use.

Multiple sclerosis and related disorders·2025
Same author

In Memoriam: Iwona Swedborg; 1936-2024.

Lymphology·2025
Same author

Coagulation factor XI relative to established cardiovascular risk factors and atherosclerosis, in a large middle-aged population.

Thrombosis research·2024
Same author

Risk of pre-eclampsia after gastric bypass: a matched cohort study.

BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology·2021

Two new platelet function assays, fibrinogen receptor activation and residual platelet counting, show promise for screening. They correlate well with established methods and offer reliable alternatives for drug evaluation.

Area of Science:

  • Hematology
  • Pharmacology
  • Biomedical Engineering

Background:

  • Platelet function is crucial in hemostasis and thrombosis.
  • Various methods exist to study platelet function, but comparing their data is essential.
  • Established methods like impedance aggregometry and PRP aggregation are effective but laborious.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare two screening-suitable platelet function assays with established methods.
  • To evaluate the reliability and sensitivity of fibrinogen receptor activation and residual platelet counting.
  • To assess the correlation between new and established platelet function assays.

Main Methods:

  • Comparison of fibrinogen receptor activation assay and residual platelet counting with impedance aggregometry and platelet-rich plasma (PRP) aggregation.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Assessment of assay variability, sensitivity to ADP, signal-to-noise ratio, and correlation.
  • Evaluation of potency for AR-C69931MX.

    • Main Results:

    • Fibrinogen receptor activation assay showed lower variability, higher sensitivity to ADP, and better signal-to-noise ratio than residual platelet counting.
    • Both new assays correlated well with PRP aggregation and each other.
    • Fibrinogen receptor activation assay demonstrated higher potency for AR-C69931MX.

    Conclusions:

    • The fibrinogen receptor activation assay and residual platelet counting are reliable alternatives for platelet function testing.
    • These assays offer advantages for screening purposes and evaluating novel platelet antagonists.
    • The studied assays provide valuable data comparable to established, albeit more laborious, methods.