Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Effect of eccentricity on pattern-pulse multifocal VEP.

Alexander I Klistorner1, Stuart L Graham

  • 1Save Sight Institute, Sydney Eye Hospital, Macquarie St, 4337, Sydney, 2001, Australia. sasha@eye.usyd.edu.au

Documenta Ophthalmologica. Advances in Ophthalmology
|December 6, 2005
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Invisible threats of microplastics induced toxicity: Oxidative and inflammatory pathways in the CNS and retina.

International review of neurobiology·2026
Same author

Synergistic retinal UCHL1 dysregulation and synaptic vulnerability reflect Alzheimer's disease severity.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same author

Identification of Chlamydia pneumoniae and NLRP3 inflammasome activation in Alzheimer's disease retina.

Nature communications·2026
Same author

Neuropeptide Y at the crossroads of neurodegeneration: Mechanistic insights and emerging therapeutic strategies.

Neuropeptides·2025
Same author

Selective Receptor Modulation by Truncated Neuropeptide Y (3-36) Dissociates Vasoconstriction from Neuroprotection in Experimental Glaucoma.

Molecular neurobiology·2025
Same author

The Dynamic Roles of Repressor Element 1-Silencing Transcription Factor (REST): A Double-Edged Sword in Neural Health and Disease.

Molecular neurobiology·2025
Same journal

Effects of short-term moderate versus high intraocular pressure elevation on flicker-induced changes in full-field electroretinogram.

Documenta ophthalmologica. Advances in ophthalmology·2026
Same journal

The relationship between foveal anatomy and retinal function in oculocutaneous albinism.

Documenta ophthalmologica. Advances in ophthalmology·2026
Same journal

Early onset primary angle closure and foveal retinoschisis associated with a pseudo-homozygous CRB1 pathogenic variant.

Documenta ophthalmologica. Advances in ophthalmology·2026
Same journal

Bilateral perifoveal macular ischemia in non-proliferative Duchenne muscular dystrophy-associated retinopathy: a case report.

Documenta ophthalmologica. Advances in ophthalmology·2026
Same journal

Association between dynamic pupil parameters and corneal sub-basal nerve plexus morphology.

Documenta ophthalmologica. Advances in ophthalmology·2026
Same journal

Structure-function relationship between handheld photopic negative response and macular GCIPL thickness in chronic optic neuropathy.

Documenta ophthalmologica. Advances in ophthalmology·2026
See all related articles

Pattern-pulse stimulation enhances multifocal visual evoked potential (mfVEP) signal/noise ratio (SNR) in the central visual field but not the periphery. This method also introduces a slight delay in mfVEP response compared to pattern-reversal stimulation.

Area of Science:

  • Ophthalmology
  • Neuroscience
  • Visual Electrophysiology

Background:

  • Pattern-pulse stimulation is a novel technique proposed to improve cortical evoked responses.
  • Its efficacy compared to conventional pattern-reversal stimulation, particularly concerning visual field eccentricity, requires detailed investigation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the effectiveness of varying pattern-pulse stimulation parameters.
  • To assess the impact of visual field eccentricity on multifocal visual evoked potential (mfVEP) amplitude and latency.
  • To compare pattern-pulse stimulation with pattern-reversal stimulation.

Main Methods:

  • Multifocal visual evoked potential (mfVEP) was recorded using Accumap with 58 checkerboard segments.
  • Optimal pattern-pulse stimulation configuration was identified.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Comparison of optimal pattern-pulse stimulation versus pattern-reversal stimulation at varying eccentricities, analyzing latency and signal/noise ratio (SNR).

    • Main Results:

    • Maximal response achieved with a specific binary sequence pattern-pulse configuration (2 'on' frames, 4 'off' frames).
    • Pattern-pulse stimulation significantly increased overall SNR (15.5+/-3.8) compared to pattern-reversal (12.4+/-2.6).
    • SNR improvement was greatest in central rings (48% in ring 1, 43% in ring 2, 26% in ring 3), diminishing in peripheral rings.
    • A significant delay (10.1+/-5.3 msec) in mfVEP response was observed with pattern-pulse stimulation.

    Conclusions:

    • Pattern-pulse stimulation enhances mfVEP amplitude in the central visual field.
    • The benefits of pattern-pulse stimulation do not extend to the peripheral visual field.
    • A trade-off exists between improved SNR in central fields and increased response latency.