Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

[Surgical glove use in France].

J L Caillot1

  • 1Service des Urgences Chirurgicales, Centre Hospitalier Lyon-Sud, Pierre-Bénite, EA 37-38 Faculté de Médecine Lyon-Sud, Oullins. JL.Caillot@wanadoo.fr

Journal De Chirurgie
|December 13, 2005
PubMed
Summary

Double gloving offers superior protection against pathogen exposure for surgeons and patients. Implementing powder-free, non-latex gloves is crucial to mitigate risks like latex allergies and peritonitis.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Image-guided preoperative progressive pneumoperitoneum for large incisional hernia repair.

Diagnostic and interventional imaging·2017
Same author

Abbreviated laparotomy or damage control laparotomy: Why, when and how to do it?

Journal of visceral surgery·2016
Same author

Feasibility of Catheter Placement Under Ultrasound Guidance for Progressive Preoperative Pneumoperitoneum for Large Incisional Hernia with Loss of Domain.

World journal of surgery·2015
Same author

[Damage control laparotomy for haemorragic abdominal trauma. A retrospective multicentric study about 109 cases].

Annales de chirurgie·2003
Same author

[Acute peritonitis].

La Revue du praticien·2002
Same author

Inadvertent prolonged fluid contact: an unappreciated professional risk for surgeons.

European journal of epidemiology·2000

Area of Science:

  • Surgical Safety
  • Infectious Disease Prevention
  • Medical Device Technology

Background:

  • Surgeons have used gloves since the late 19th century to prevent patient infections.
  • The AIDS epidemic in the 1980s emphasized universal precautions for surgeon and patient safety.
  • The surgeon-patient interface necessitates optimized barrier protection and modified surgical techniques.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the efficacy of surgical gloves in preventing pathogen exposure.
  • To assess the risks associated with current glove practices, including perforations and allergies.
  • To advocate for improved glove protocols and materials in surgical settings.

Main Methods:

  • Review of historical practices and the impact of infectious disease epidemics on glove use.
  • Analysis of the limitations of single-glove use and the benefits of double gloving.
  • Examination of risks posed by glove powder and latex, including allergies and peritonitis.

Main Results:

  • Single-layer gloves provide a fragile barrier, with unrecognized perforations leading to prolonged exposure.
  • Double gloving is identified as the most effective method for pathogen exposure protection.
  • Glove powder and latex present risks such as latex allergies and adhesive peritonitis.

Conclusions:

  • Double gloving is the optimal strategy for minimizing pathogen exposure during surgery.
  • Addressing latex allergies and peritonitis requires a shift towards powder-free, non-latex glove options.
  • New institutional protocols are essential to ensure the availability of advanced glove materials for French surgeons.

Related Experiment Videos