Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Quality assurance issues and PACS.

H D Banta1

  • 1TNO/WHO Programme in Health Care Technology Assessment, Leiden, The Netherlands.

International Journal of Bio-Medical Computing
|May 1, 1992
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Introduction: mass screening, health technology assessment, and health policy in some European countries.

International journal of technology assessment in health care·2001
Same author

Health technology assessment and screening in The Netherlands: case studies of mammography in breast cancer, PSA screening in prostate cancer, and ultrasound in normal pregnancy.

International journal of technology assessment in health care·2001
Same author

Health technology assessment and screening in Sweden.

International journal of technology assessment in health care·2001
Same author

Health policy, health technology assessment, and screening in Europe.

International journal of technology assessment in health care·2001
Same author

Global issues on the agenda at the World Health Assembly: discussion of HIV/AIDS, leprosy, access to drugs.

JAMA·2001
Same author

Worldwide interest in global access to drugs.

JAMA·2001
Same journal

Commentary on a futuristic model of patient record systems and telemedicine.

International journal of bio-medical computing·1996
Same journal

Nonlinear eye movement detection method for drowsiness studies.

International journal of bio-medical computing·1996
Same journal

Segmentation of auditory brainstem response signals.

International journal of bio-medical computing·1996
Same journal

A comparison of neural network and Bayes recognition approaches in the evaluation of the brainstem trigeminal evoked potentials in multiple sclerosis.

International journal of bio-medical computing·1996
Same journal

Methodology for using the UMLS as a background knowledge for the description of surgical procedures.

International journal of bio-medical computing·1996
Same journal

An MLP-based model for identifying qEEG in depression.

International journal of bio-medical computing·1996
See all related articles

Quality assessment in healthcare is crucial due to suboptimal care. The impact of Picture Archiving and Communication Systems (PACS) on patient health outcomes remains unknown, despite their potential for improving diagnostic efficiency and quality.

Area of Science:

  • Healthcare quality assessment
  • Medical imaging informatics

Background:

  • Healthcare quality is a significant concern, with evidence suggesting suboptimal care standards.
  • Health outcomes are the definitive measure for evaluating healthcare quality and system goals.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the impact of Picture Archiving and Communication Systems (PACS) on patient health outcomes.
  • To assess whether PACS implementation leads to measurable improvements in healthcare quality.

Main Methods:

  • This study focuses on the theoretical potential of PACS to enhance diagnostic efficiency.
  • Empirical evidence linking PACS to improved health outcomes is currently lacking.

Main Results:

  • The direct effects of PACS on patient health outcomes have not yet been determined.

Related Experiment Videos

  • While PACS may improve diagnostic efficiency, concrete evidence of quality improvement is absent.

    • Conclusions:

    • Further research is needed to establish a causal link between PACS and enhanced patient health outcomes.
    • The potential benefits of PACS for healthcare quality assurance require empirical validation.