Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 14, 2026

Xenopus laevis as a Model to Identify Translation Impairment
Published on: September 27, 2015
Translation of Sindbis virus 26S mRNA does not require intact eukariotic initiation factor 4G
Alfredo Castelló1, Miguel Angel Sanz, Susana Molina
1Centro de Biología Molecular "Severo Ochoa" (CSIC-UAM), Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Cantoblanco, 28049 Madrid, Spain. acastello@cbm.uam.es
Abstract:
The infection of baby hamster kidney (BHK) cells by Sindbis virus gives rise to a drastic inhibition of cellular translation, while under these conditions the synthesis of viral structural proteins directed by the subgenomic 26S mRNA takes place efficiently. Here, the requirement for intact initiation factor eIF4G for the translation of this subgenomic mRNA has been examined. To this end, SV replicons that contain the protease of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) or the poliovirus 2A(pro) replacing the sequences of SV glycoproteins have been constructed. BHK cells electroporated with the different RNAs synthesize protein C and the corresponding protease at late times. Notably, the proteolysis of eIF4G by both proteases has little effect on the translation of the 26S mRNA. In addition, recombinant viable SVs were engineered that encode HIV-1 PR or poliovirus 2A protease under the control of a duplicated late promoter. Viral protein synthesis at late times of infection by the recombinant viruses is slightly affected in BHK cells that contain proteolysed eIF4G. The translatability of SV genomic 49S mRNA was assayed in BHK cells infected with a recombinant virus that synthesizes luciferase and transfected with a replicon that expresses poliovirus 2Apro. Under conditions where eIF4G has been hydrolysed significantly the translation of genomic SV RNA was deeply inhibited. These findings indicate a different requirement for intact eIF4G in the translation of genomic and subgenomic SV mRNAs. Finally, the translation of the reporter gene that encodes green fluorescent protein, placed under the control of a second duplicate late promoter, is also resistant to the cleavage of eIF4G. In conclusion, despite the presence of a cap structure in the 5' end of the subgenomic SV mRNA, intact eIF4G is not necessary for its translation.
Insights
Sindbis virus infection inhibits host translation but allows viral protein synthesis. Intact initiation factor eIF4G is not required for subgenomic Sindbis virus mRNA translation, but is essential for genomic mRNA translation.
Area of Science:
- Virology
- Molecular Biology
- Cellular Biology
Background:
- Sindbis virus (SV) infection of baby hamster kidney (BHK) cells inhibits cellular translation.
- Viral structural protein synthesis from subgenomic 26S mRNA occurs efficiently during infection.
- The role of intact eukaryotic initiation factor 4G (eIF4G) in SV mRNA translation is investigated.
Purpose of the Study:
- To determine the necessity of intact eIF4G for the translation of SV subgenomic 26S mRNA.
- To compare the eIF4G requirement for genomic and subgenomic SV mRNA translation.
- To investigate the impact of eIF4G cleavage on viral protein synthesis.
Main Methods:
- Construction of SV replicons and recombinant viruses encoding HIV-1 protease or poliovirus 2A protease.
- Electroporation of BHK cells with viral RNAs and infection with recombinant viruses.
- Assessing protein synthesis and mRNA translation under conditions of eIF4G proteolysis.
Main Results:
- Proteolysis of eIF4G by viral proteases had minimal impact on 26S mRNA translation.
- Translation of SV genomic 49S mRNA was significantly inhibited when eIF4G was cleaved.
- Translation of reporter genes (green fluorescent protein) under control of a late promoter was resistant to eIF4G cleavage.
Conclusions:
- Intact eIF4G is not essential for the cap-dependent translation of subgenomic SV mRNA.
- Genomic and subgenomic SV mRNAs exhibit differential requirements for intact eIF4G.
- These findings highlight distinct translation regulation mechanisms for different viral RNA species.
Related Concept Videos
Initiation of Translation
First, the initiator tRNA must be selected from the pool of elongator tRNAs by eukaryotic initiation factor 2 (eIF2). The initiator tRNA (Met-tRNAi) has conserved sequence elements including modified bases at...
Initiation of Translation
First, the initiator tRNA must be selected from the pool of elongator tRNAs by eukaryotic initiation factor 2 (eIF2). The initiator tRNA (Met-tRNAi) has conserved sequence elements including modified bases at...
Leaky Scanning
siRNA - Small Interfering RNAs
In the cytoplasm, siRNA is processed from a double-stranded RNA, which comes from either endogenous DNA transcription or exogenous sources like a virus. This double-stranded RNA is then cleaved by the ATP-dependent...
Translation
Translation is the process of synthesizing proteins from the genetic information carried by messenger RNA (mRNA). Following transcription, it constitutes the final step in the expression of genes. This process is carried out by ribosomes, complexes of protein and specialized RNA molecules. Ribosomes, transfer RNA (tRNA), and other proteins produce a chain of amino acids—the polypeptide—as the end product of translation.
Translation Produces the Building Blocks of Life
Translation
Translation is the process of synthesizing proteins from the genetic information carried by messenger RNA (mRNA). Following transcription, it constitutes the final step in the expression of genes. This process is carried out by ribosomes, complexes of protein and specialized RNA molecules. Ribosomes, transfer RNA (tRNA), and other proteins produce a chain of amino acids—the polypeptide—as the end product of translation.
Translation Produces the Building Blocks of Life

